Since "L*tinx" provides no electoral benefits why don't Democrats reject it outright? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 16, 2024, 03:08:12 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  Since "L*tinx" provides no electoral benefits why don't Democrats reject it outright? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Since "L*tinx" provides no electoral benefits why don't Democrats reject it outright?  (Read 1306 times)
omar04
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 612
« on: October 23, 2021, 11:00:56 PM »
This recent trend of optimizing everything for the sake of more votes is dumb. If you don't agree with Latinx it should be because Spanish is a gendered language and the x is not even pronounceable, not because it's unpopular. Or really, any actual policy.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.017 seconds with 12 queries.