Hypocrisy is word D's move to compromise on budget but won't compromise on stimulus (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 27, 2024, 06:08:21 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  Hypocrisy is word D's move to compromise on budget but won't compromise on stimulus (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Hypocrisy is word D's move to compromise on budget but won't compromise on stimulus  (Read 387 times)
Vaccinated Russian Bear
Russian Bear
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,106
« on: November 26, 2020, 09:45:10 AM »

There are many people in Food lines shortages, but will Trump sign another Budget deal and got had on the first budget deal.  The budget deal in Oct included the same numbers but he got no leverage on the Stimulus package, will he make a similar concession on another Budget deal.

Dems are just offering budgets deals but not givings nothing on the stimulus we should find out

Dems thought that sabotaging Trump's stimulus 2.0 would help them in 2020, it likely didn't, probably even backfired. Now, they think it will help them in GA run-offs. I don't know. It might backfire once more.

Remember! Trump offered $1.8 trillion Trump Stimulus, and Grim Reaper McConnell promised to bring it to the floor.


WaPo Opinion>
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2020/11/19/trump-isnt-obstacle-coronavirus-aid-pelosi-is/
Quote
“No, I don’t care about that,” Pelosi claimed, and repeatedly accused Blitzer of being an “apologist” for Trump throughout the interview. It was a laughable charge, intended to obscure the fact that the truthful answer was yes — that’s exactly what this is all about. Struggling Americans don’t care whose name is on the check. They just need the money. But Pelosi seems to care less about getting them the help they need than stopping Trump from sharing credit for a bipartisan solution. Why else turn down multiple GOP offers for covid relief? In July, Senate Republicans offered $1.1 trillion, including $300 billion for stimulus checks to Americans, $200 billion to help small businesses, $110 billion for unemployment benefits, and $105 billion in aid to state and local governments. In September, the White House raised the offer to $1.6 trillion. In October, the president increased it further to $1.8 trillion. But Pelosi steadfastly refused, insisting on $2.2 trillion or nothing. Twice, Senate Republicans tried to pass more limited $500 billion bills, but Democrats filibustered both. Why not accept one of these offers? The only logical answer is that any stimulus would have boosted the economy before the election, and Pelosi was willing to drive the economy into a ditch to hurt Trump.


Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.025 seconds with 12 queries.