Respectfully, I overrule the previous ruling and declare the amendment frivolous due to lacking clear instructions.
I welcome another amendment from the sponsor providing a copy of the relevant bill showing what they want stricken.
For the record I also frown upon such amendments and am fully aware the PPT has leeway to reject amendments that are not sufficiently comprehensible, but it seemed relatively clear what the intent of the amendment was (strike a full section). Westy followed the OSPR as interpreted. But Senators
should provide the full text of their proposed amendments regardless, this goes for everyone here.
As to the text of the amendment itself, lol.
