Your parties of choice worldwide (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 04, 2024, 12:53:52 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  International General Discussion (Moderators: afleitch, Hash)
  Your parties of choice worldwide (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Your parties of choice worldwide  (Read 12090 times)
Хahar 🤔
Xahar
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 41,708
Bangladesh


Political Matrix
E: -6.77, S: 0.61

WWW
« on: March 12, 2008, 06:26:39 PM »
« edited: March 12, 2008, 07:07:35 PM by Vice-Chairman Xahar »

UK: RESPECT
N. Ireland: Alliance
Wales: Plaid Cymru
Scotland: SNP
Ireland: Socialist
Iceland: Social Democratic Alliance
Norway: Socialist Left
Sweden: Social Democratic
Finland: Left Alliance
Poland: Labour
Russia: KPRF
Ukraine: Social Democratic
Romania: Social Democratic
Bulgaria: Socialist
Greece: Communist
Serbia: Social Democratic
Kosovo: Democratic Party
Montenegro: Socialist People's
Croatia: Social Democratic
Italy: Democratic Socialists
Switzerland: Social Democratic
Austria: Social Democratic
Germany: Left
Holland: Socialist
Belgium: Socialist
Luxembourg: Socialist Workers'
France: Communist
Spain: Socialist Workers'
Portugal: Socialist
Cyprus: Progressive
Malta: Labour
Czech: Social Democratic
Slovakia:
BiH:
Slovenia:
Estonia:
Lithuania:
Latvia:

Israel: Fatah
Turkey:
Lebanon:
India: Congress
Pakistan:
Bangladesh: Awami League, though all the parties are corrupt except for the Jamaat-e-Islami, which I would never consider voting for.
Thailand:
Taiwan:
Japan:
South Korea:
Malaysia:
Indonesia:
Australia:
NZ:
Fiji:
Mongolia:
Georgia:
Armenia:
Azerbaijan:
Others??

South Africa:
Kenya:
Others??

Canada: NDP
Quebec: Bloc
Puerto Rico:
Jamaica:
Mexico:
Colombia:
Venezuela:
Brazil:
Peru:
Ecuador:
Bolivia:
Uruguay:
Argentina:
Chilie:
Others??

To be continued...
Logged
Хahar 🤔
Xahar
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 41,708
Bangladesh


Political Matrix
E: -6.77, S: 0.61

WWW
« Reply #1 on: March 12, 2008, 07:37:44 PM »


Eh...Galloway.
Logged
Хahar 🤔
Xahar
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 41,708
Bangladesh


Political Matrix
E: -6.77, S: 0.61

WWW
« Reply #2 on: March 13, 2008, 06:12:27 PM »


Eh, not that much into the revolutionary stuff. I might've voted for him, though.
Logged
Хahar 🤔
Xahar
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 41,708
Bangladesh


Political Matrix
E: -6.77, S: 0.61

WWW
« Reply #3 on: March 16, 2008, 01:51:29 PM »


Wow. And I thought the name blow that was bad when I looked at it.
Logged
Хahar 🤔
Xahar
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 41,708
Bangladesh


Political Matrix
E: -6.77, S: 0.61

WWW
« Reply #4 on: March 16, 2008, 03:28:44 PM »

Bangladesh: wouldn't vote for either of those crooked old battleaxes

Thank you. That answer was desperately needed.
Logged
Хahar 🤔
Xahar
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 41,708
Bangladesh


Political Matrix
E: -6.77, S: 0.61

WWW
« Reply #5 on: March 29, 2008, 09:14:09 PM »

Fact: Wilders doesn't want any more muslims to come into the country.

I don't see what's wrong with that. If they were assimilating into Dutch or even some sort of broad Western culture that would be one thing, but they aren't.

Define "assimilation". I think I'm assimilating just fine.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Muslims don't need a mosque to practice their religion. They can pray in each other's homes or use existing mosques. If they would stop hiring fascists as their Imams I'm sure Mr. Wilders would reconsider his position.

And Christians don't need churches. Jews don't need synagogues. And who is "they"? My imams are not fascists.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Mein Kampf is banned in Germany, what's the difference?

You're suggesting that that makes it right?

I own a copy of Mein Kampf. I read it frequently. I own several copies of the Qur'an. I read them frequently. There are no more similarities than any two books are bound to have by definition.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

I don't believe that in the U.S. you can hold more than one nationality and be in congress, and no one seems to mind that there. If someone were to hold another nationality don't you think even Obama would jump on that if they were his opponent?

Nationality≠citizenship.

I love how people can get away with putting forth the most vile, racist, sexist garbage as long as they call it a religion, and then when their disgusting beliefs are challenged they claim that the challengers are the discriminatory ones. Religion is a cancer, and Islam just happens to be the most immediately dangerous and malignant form at the moment. Anyone who wants to get rid of it, with the exception of those trying to impose a different religion, should be applauded.

You can oppose religion. I have no problem with that. You cannot oppose the practice of religion by others. That violates basic rights. If I want to believe that 2+2=3, that is my perogative.

The author of the Quran has been dead much much longer than just 70 years, so the same thing clearly couldn't be applied here.

The author of the Qur'an is not dead by any means, but that's neither here nor there.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.027 seconds with 10 queries.