Senator Xahar stays on as Pacific Council Speaker

[Хahar 🤔]

As long as I have the support of a majority of the Council (which I do), I fail to see the problem here.

[Хahar 🤔]

As long as I have the support of a majority of the Council (which I do), I fail to see the problem here.

The way I see it, the problem here is the open hostility of the NM-AM towards what most of Atlasia considers democratic and politically correct methods. The problem here is not legal, it is the abuse of constitutional loop holes, the inactivity of your members to do anything when elected and the constant undermining of any alternative proposal as some kind of reactionary and pseudo fascist (yes, I know you don't use that specific word) method.

At no point has the National Movement ever tried to hide the fact that it is a revolutionary party. If people didn't want that, they wouldn't have voted for NMAM members.

The problem is that, Xahar, you shouldn't be speaker. You should appoint it to someone who is serving as a councilman/councilwoman and I don't care if it's Kitteh or PJ or FuzzyBigFoot. They are serving for the people of the Pacific and they should be the speaker.

[Хahar 🤔]

I offer only this: If the person in Xahar's position was a Federalist, would the NMAM be as supportive?

For that to be the case, the Federalist Party would have to be a different (and much better) party, to which the National Movement might grant its support.

[Хahar 🤔]

Has everyone forgotten how the game was six months ago, before it had villains? It was awful.

To elaborate on what Bacon King said, we do have goals for the game that we have articulated in the past (I have explained at length how I feel that abolishing the regions and reducing the number of offices would do wonders to revitalize the game) and our primary aim is to promote alternatives beyond the ossified way of thinking that has prevailed in Atlasia since 2008. If that means being a mustache-twirling villain now and again, well, that's just a bonus.