$250,000 a year isn't rich! (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 19, 2024, 05:05:49 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  $250,000 a year isn't rich! (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: $250,000 a year isn't rich!  (Read 13837 times)
Хahar 🤔
Xahar
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 41,707
Bangladesh


Political Matrix
E: -6.77, S: 0.61

WWW
« on: October 10, 2011, 08:41:52 PM »

Oh, and the $700,000 home someone mentioned.... where I'm from that's insane. For 700 grand it had better be a huge lakefront mansion next door to Cedar Point. Anyone who'd ever consider buying a $700k house is rich and knows it. My parents' house is worth about $120k. They probably paid less than half that amount for it 25 years ago when they bought it off my grandparents. Yup, my Dad grew up in the same house I did. Of course then it was surrounded by corn fields and now it's in a neighborhood, a nice neighborhood at that.

Where I live, a 2,280-square foot house will set you back $1.1 million. It's a bit much.
Logged
Хahar 🤔
Xahar
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 41,707
Bangladesh


Political Matrix
E: -6.77, S: 0.61

WWW
« Reply #1 on: October 18, 2011, 03:22:02 PM »

I'd like to raise an issue which I'm not sure has been discussed since I have not looked through the whole thread.  The tax on dividends and capital gains is a paltry 15%.  And I think that is where a lot of wealthy folks are getting off easier than they should -- the low tax rates on investment income disproportionately favors them.

It seems fundamentally wrong to me that making money for doing work is taxed at a higher rate than doing nothing and accumulating money.
Logged
Хahar 🤔
Xahar
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 41,707
Bangladesh


Political Matrix
E: -6.77, S: 0.61

WWW
« Reply #2 on: October 18, 2011, 08:45:26 PM »

I'd like to raise an issue which I'm not sure has been discussed since I have not looked through the whole thread.  The tax on dividends and capital gains is a paltry 15%.  And I think that is where a lot of wealthy folks are getting off easier than they should -- the low tax rates on investment income disproportionately favors them.

It seems fundamentally wrong to me that making money for doing work is taxed at a higher rate than doing nothing and accumulating money.

Investments is not "doing nothing", for people who actually work in the field.

And what about people who don't work in the field? They still accumulate money.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.019 seconds with 13 queries.