Did Clinton do as well as expected on ST? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 31, 2024, 09:23:12 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  Did Clinton do as well as expected on ST? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Did Clinton do as well as expected on ST?  (Read 4800 times)
Ogre Mage
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,503
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.39, S: -5.22

P
« on: March 02, 2016, 03:43:31 AM »

I don't think many people expected Sanders to win Vermont and nothing else.  That certainly wasn't my expectation.  And I wasn't surprised by his big margin of victory in Minnesota and Colorado.  The demographics of the Democratic base in those states are fertile territory for him.  I was surprised by his solid win in Oklahoma but there are always going to be some surprises.  This is a race for delegates and Clinton was the unquestioned winner there because of the shellacking she delivered across the South (except OK) where the biggest delegate rich prizes were.  In the one significant delegate-rich state in Bernie's backyard -- MA -- she managed to pull off a narrow win.  And she crushed with African-American voters across the south and with Latinos in Texas so she can make the argument her coalition looks like the full spectrum of the party.  She now has a pledged delegate lead which will be extremely difficult to overcome.  
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.025 seconds with 13 queries.