Predctions on Election 2004 (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 05, 2024, 02:48:42 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2004 U.S. Presidential Election
  Predctions on Election 2004 (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Predctions on Election 2004  (Read 8010 times)
zachman
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,096
« on: March 08, 2004, 04:49:59 PM »
Wow! You only picked two states without a plurality. Crossfire is about to talk about Tom Brokaw.
Logged
zachman
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,096
« Reply #1 on: March 08, 2004, 06:45:03 PM »
Anyone who voted for Buchanan wouldn't have voted for Bush or Gore.
Logged
zachman
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,096
« Reply #2 on: March 08, 2004, 07:06:47 PM »
Buchannan came close to a no name libertarian candidate.
Logged
zachman
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,096
« Reply #3 on: March 09, 2004, 04:31:01 PM »
Clinton worked on fighting Al-Qaeda particularly after the USS Cole was attacked. Bush ignored Al-Qaeda until after 9/11. I will not blame Bush for  9/11, but it is pathetic how he plays the blame game with Clinton, while he has been the beneficiary of 9/11, and as he did not focus his security advisors on Al-Qaeda threats before 9/11.
Logged
zachman
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,096
« Reply #4 on: March 13, 2004, 05:40:16 PM »
Of course we should have a national interest in the wars we fight. We had a national interest after we were attacked in Pearl Harbor or to annex Texas in the Mexican-American war. All American wars for land or retalliation security have been fought for a national interest.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.022 seconds with 11 queries.