NEW AP POLL - Bush +1% - Nader @ 6% (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 23, 2024, 06:31:19 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2004 U.S. Presidential Election
  NEW AP POLL - Bush +1% - Nader @ 6% (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: NEW AP POLL - Bush +1% - Nader @ 6%  (Read 4553 times)
zachman
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,096


« on: March 04, 2004, 07:37:57 PM »

Based on historical data my prediction is George W. will be defeated. Woodrow Wilson was the only elected incumbent president to win by less than 5% (and that was an extraordinary era), all the other elected incumbents have won by landslides. If an incumbent is tied, he is really behind.
Logged
zachman
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,096


« Reply #1 on: March 04, 2004, 07:43:27 PM »

I think a lot of the undecided independents who like neither Kerry or Bush chose Nader, but obviously do not plan to vote for him. If Nader stayed at 5% nationwide, this could mean trouble.
Logged
zachman
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,096


« Reply #2 on: March 04, 2004, 07:51:55 PM »

Would someone reject a poll because they said likely voters?

I would even answer a poll now even though I am not even od enough to vote.
Logged
zachman
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,096


« Reply #3 on: March 04, 2004, 07:53:59 PM »

What turned off some independents to the democrats was the supporters clapping at anti-Bush jabs. The same negative effect will now happen to the republicans as they hear Bush's supporters clap and laugh at Bush's simple attacks.
Logged
zachman
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,096


« Reply #4 on: March 04, 2004, 09:42:08 PM »

Why didn't they let Perot debate in 96'?

How did Perot qualify for the debate in 92'?
Logged
zachman
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,096


« Reply #5 on: March 05, 2004, 02:49:07 PM »

The Green Party might still have a future with the mayor of New Paltz New York. He could really kill the democrats this time.
Logged
zachman
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,096


« Reply #6 on: March 05, 2004, 02:57:24 PM »

I wouldn't be shocked if he ran, and he would likely do as well as Nader did, and will do well in states like Massachusetts, New York, and California.
Logged
zachman
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,096


« Reply #7 on: March 05, 2004, 03:06:20 PM »

He would get real support though in urban areas though. He could be the swing in Florida or Pennsylvania, but he would do strongest in the cosmopolitan states.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.031 seconds with 13 queries.