the "son of perdition"

[Bunwahaha [still dunno why, but well, so be it]]

Yes, I agree with the preceding post here. If you don't share his "beliefs" don't even offer him the present to, even eventually, just for making him get a point, go in his sens.

Though, I liked the first attempt Eraserhead.

prophetman, now maybe you should try fresh air in your mind, you should try other things. If you apologize for the words you had toward other human beings, you'll always find a human being to forgive you.

[Bunwahaha [still dunno why, but well, so be it]]

Prophetman, there are many more races than just whites and blacks. What are Latinos, Asians, Native Americans, Arabs, etc according to your philosophy? What the  is Michael Jackson?

You must be logged in to read this quote.

If God created man's physical attributes based on the genes in their DNA, why would a different pattern of genes constitute evil? It's as arbitrary as saying everyone born with dwarfism is the 'son of perdition' or perhaps any born with a predilection of Alzheimer's, or anyone born with green eyes, or everyone from Iceland. The fact is, there's nothing specific in that verse for black people that specifically incriminates them. You just don't like black people.

You must be logged in to read this quote.

Michael Jackson was a black man who descended from Cain and from Ham.  Thus, he was one of those whom the scriptures call,  "son of perdition" and "man of sin" or "man of lawlessness."

But he had a skin condition that changed the pigmentation of his skin. Anyway, you didn't mention my first question by saying that whites and blacks were the "major players" in the Bible. And yet, God's chosen people, the Israelites, are their own race. And people of Asian decent are the most populous in the world, are they just cannon fodder? I know the fact that you simply don't like black people informs this interpretation of Scripture, I'm just trying to illustrate that it doesn't make any sense.

It seems like for every Christian I find, I find another interpretation of Revelations. Who is the man of perdition? Is it the blacks, the Catholics, secularism, Protestants who have lost their way, Nazis, America, Israel, Muslims, aliens, the UN? More and more I'm thinking it's just another Biblical red herring used to justify prejudice.

The man of sin; son of perdition is symbolized in Revelation 13 and 17 as, "the ten horns" that are upon Babylon the great (upon America).

Daniel as well in 7:24 described the man of sin as, "another ten horns" (another people) who rise after the ten kings (after the European Americans).

Verses 25 and 26 goes on to describe that other ten horns and what they will do.

It says, they are diverse from the ten kings (diverse from the European Americans), and that, they will subdue and bring under subjection the ten kings.  That they will think to change the times and laws of the ten kings, and that they will take away the dominion of the ten kings and will consume and destroy the nation until the end.


Based on everthing else said about the  man of sin; son of perdition in Daniel and Revelation, the ten horns cannot be any other people EXCEPT African Americans.

OK, now would you acknowledge that everything that you put between brackets haven't here the slightest justification, and that that are just totally personal interpretations? It's a bit light to condemn a group of people in the name of "THE" truth.