Would you support a bombing of Iran? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 03, 2024, 09:32:19 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Debate (Moderator: Torie)
  Would you support a bombing of Iran? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Go.
#1
Yes
 
#2
No
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 52

Author Topic: Would you support a bombing of Iran?  (Read 10088 times)
Bunwahaha [still dunno why, but well, so be it]
tsionebreicruoc
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,385
France


« on: February 16, 2010, 05:19:04 PM »
« edited: February 16, 2010, 05:26:00 PM by Bunoah »

...beyond Lieberman Israel's leaders always spoke about the fact they could attack Iran when they would judge it accurate to do so. I wonder whether they will wait the end of this year, the affair is becoming hotter and hotter, isn't it?

Considering that I don't support America hypocritically telling other countries that they aren't allowed to develop nuclear weapons, I would say no.

Exactly.  Israel can have them.  Pakistan can have them.  India can have them.  We can have them.  But not Iran.  Critics say, "but we NEED them to check our enemies."  And so do the Iranians.  Of course, I'd prefer total nuclear disarmament of all countries but since that's not going to happen...fair is fair. 

If "fairness" is the only reason you can come up with to allow the Islamic Republic of Iran to have nukes, we have a serious problem.

So any country needs the express permission of the United States in order to build a nuke.  Maybe that's why so many people hate the United States so much?  Because we can't seem to respect other country's sovereignty?

^^^^^^^^

Bloody hell, boys, if you could figure that out now, you're speaking as if the world was your playground, just imagine if other countries did so about your territory and your politics, you're digging your grave and you're claiming to do that for your sake...


Congrats boy, you're officially fallen in the trap, not the Iranian trap, in the worldwide trap. You just don't get that Ahmadinejad wants to fool you on the world scene, wants to break the world between West and Anti-West?

Internet is a cool stuff, you should try to use it to enter in communications with random average people around the world, in order to have a clue about the psychological pace beyond that so cool western cocoon...

WW3 because, in a 1st time, growing of the anti-West psychological feeling around the world amongst political regimes, in a very 2nd time, the slightest Israel/Western bomb touching the Iranian soil would certainly lead Iran to open fire on every Israeli/Western targets it can touch in the region. This certainly leading to a massive cuts in oil exportation worldwide. And, for a while I wanted to open a thread about that, but which consequences could it have on the glorious global economy? And if the global economy takes one more very hard shot, what will happen about that wonderful relationship between China and US? That very nationalist China that really earned personal confidence these last times. Not to speak about Chavez who said that he would do something if US touched Iran, and that would be one more pole of tensions in the world, and an oil one too, with Ecuador, oil too, with him.

So much great perspectives to bomb Iran, and all of this because of some provocations from a regime apparently less and less supported by its population, and overall with never having tried an actual and tough dialog using the weapons of the guy, the world scene. The only positive aspect could be that a bombing would lead to a big war on Iran that would more and more destabilize the regime and would permit the opposition to overthrow it, though could also lead to a civil war with pasdarans. So, here would be the painting, enjoy.

In short, a bombing of Iran would be a huge destabilization of the geopolitical world we know and this in the name of a suspicion toward something we already do (having nukes) and this because not being able to deal with a plain provoker. Bloody hell, let's learn subtlety and actual strong dialog, instead of offended pointless postures. Beyond being unfair with the rest of the world we're ridiculous and ineffective.

As to the question, you guess I answer no, but the question is not even whether, US or West or UN would do that, I tend to think China would always block tough sanctions and if ever they accept it, but, if the affair continues to last, I would be surprise that Israel remains patient a long time. Last year, I said it would happen this year if nothing really changes, by now I haven't changed, let's see what would happen in UN soon, let's especially see what China does, let's just see if Israel can make good surprises...

Logged
Bunwahaha [still dunno why, but well, so be it]
tsionebreicruoc
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,385
France


« Reply #1 on: February 22, 2010, 11:17:14 AM »

If you really think there is a danger, give a shield to Israel, instead of annoying Eastern Europe with that, and let the Iranian regime becoming weaker on its own with the time, instead of risking a global mess.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.021 seconds with 13 queries.