Stupidest piece of legislation considered all year (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 09, 2024, 02:14:41 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  Stupidest piece of legislation considered all year (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Stupidest piece of legislation considered all year  (Read 2266 times)
dead0man
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 46,597
United States


« on: September 30, 2008, 12:40:00 AM »
Quote from: StatesRights on September 30, 2008, 12:16:06 AM

At least we have another "War Against".

Quote from: Rorschach on September 30, 2008, 12:16:02 AM
Oh well, at least he believes in Evolution. Unlike some people.

Which version of the THEORY of Evolution should we believe in?
Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
"theory" doesn't mean what you think it means.  For example, we are nowhere close to having a "theory" of Global Warming because the tests they run for it suck balls.  Evolution is a fact.  (and it doesn't disprove God at all)
Logged
dead0man
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 46,597
United States


« Reply #1 on: September 30, 2008, 12:53:35 AM »
Dogs do it for me.  The Galapogos did it for Darwin.  Madagascar is pretty good too.  Hell, any large island reasonbly seperated from the mainland for 100,000 years.

..and I hate Dawkins with a passion.
Logged
dead0man
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 46,597
United States


« Reply #2 on: September 30, 2008, 01:04:52 AM »
Nah, Dawkins is a douche.  He's smart and he's (generally) right, but he's still an asshat.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.019 seconds with 10 queries.