If someone were to invent a cure for cancer... (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 12, 2024, 10:51:20 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Debate (Moderator: Torie)
  If someone were to invent a cure for cancer... (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: should they be allowed to charge as much as they want?
#1
Yes (D)
 
#2
No (D)
 
#3
Yes (R)
 
#4
No (R)
 
#5
Yes (Ind./3rd party)
 
#6
No (Ind./3rd party)
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 42

Author Topic: If someone were to invent a cure for cancer...  (Read 4769 times)
dead0man
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 46,609
United States


« on: June 18, 2008, 12:06:07 PM »

There will never be a single cure for all cancers, but yes, people that invent or discover new medical procedures, drugs or whatever should be able to get as much money out of it as he or she can, just like any other industry.  We do want medical advances to keep coming at the same speed right?  If you limit the funds these people can make from their labor in time you will see less capital investment, fewer smart people doing the work and fewer new technologies. 

If it means more to you to give everybody decent medical care than it is to advance medical science further for everybody, well, I guess that's your choice.  It's an awfully shortsighted one, but a lot of left wing/statist positions are.
Logged
dead0man
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 46,609
United States


« Reply #1 on: June 19, 2008, 03:24:50 AM »

There will never be a single cure for all cancers, but yes, people that invent or discover new medical procedures, drugs or whatever should be able to get as much money out of it as he or she can, just like any other industry.  We do want medical advances to keep coming at the same speed right?  If you limit the funds these people can make from their labor in time you will see less capital investment, fewer smart people doing the work and fewer new technologies. 

If it means more to you to give everybody decent medical care than it is to advance medical science further for everybody, well, I guess that's your choice.  It's an awfully shortsighted one, but a lot of left wing/statist positions are.

Except you aren't advancing medical science for everybody.  You're advancing for the person that discovers it and the group of people that can afford it.  You are no longer curing cancer.. you are simply allowing those that can afford it to live without it.
Only in the same way that DVD's and VCR's and Laser Disc players are "only for the rich".  Eventually that sh**t trickles down.  I'd rather have a cheap cure for cancer in 10 or 20 years and an expensive one in the mean time than no cure at all, ever.
Logged
dead0man
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 46,609
United States


« Reply #2 on: June 20, 2008, 01:47:45 PM »

Of course not, but it's ignorant to think they all do it out of pure altruism.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.027 seconds with 14 queries.