opinion of Blue Angel/Thunderbirds flyovers (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 23, 2024, 12:06:46 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Debate (Moderator: Torie)
  opinion of Blue Angel/Thunderbirds flyovers (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: opinion of Blue Angel/Thunderbirds flyovers
#1
approve
 
#2
approved until I found out/thought about the cost, now I'm meh
 
#3
meh
 
#4
approved until I found out/thought about the cost, now I'm against
 
#5
against
 
#6
secondary weasel answer
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 43

Author Topic: opinion of Blue Angel/Thunderbirds flyovers  (Read 1421 times)
dead0man
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 46,522
United States


« on: May 06, 2020, 04:36:53 PM »

link
Quote
To start, flyovers cost America money. According to the Washington Post, each flight hour for the Blue Angels and Thunderbird squadrons costs at least $60,000; with flyovers planned for at least 22 cities between both squadrons, that's a rough cost of at least $1.32 million — enough to purchase dozens of ventilators at, say, $20,000 a pop.

To be fair, this isn't money that's suddenly being allocated to flyovers out of nowhere: one unnamed military official told the Post that "the cost of the flights will come from money already in the Pentagon budget," while The War Zone rightly notes that both Blue Angel and Thunderbird pilots and their support personnel still need to constantly train to maintain their proficiency with the aircraft.

"Whether they are in or working on gray or colorfully painted jets doesn't change that," as The War Zone's Tyler Rogoway notes. "Why not at least use that flight time to spread a positive message and give people a little joy in what has been bleak and uncertain period?"

Perhaps it's less a matter of cost and more a matter of symbolism. If the goal is to send a message of support and solidarity to front-line workers, wouldn't a better sign involve putting more of the 27,000 former soldiers who volunteered to come back into the service to good use? Or answering the call for an influx of personal protective gear to, say, those VA hospitals that are currently struggling without?
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.025 seconds with 14 queries.