Should the standards for substitute teachers be higher? (user search)

	Welcome, Guest. Please login or register. Did you miss your activation email? June 03, 2024, 10:02:55 AM

News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

Talk Elections

General Politics

U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)

Should the standards for substitute teachers be higher? (search mode)

Pages: [1]

Poll

Question:

Should the standards for substitute teachers be higher?

#1 Yes		33 (78.6%)
#2 No		9 (21.4%)

Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 42

Author

Topic: Should the standards for substitute teachers be higher? (Read 1452 times)

dead0man
Atlas Legend

Posts: 46,566

Re: Should the standards for substitute teachers be higher?

« on: February 07, 2016, 03:09:08 PM »

Probably, but why? Aren't they, quite literally, baby sitters 98% of the time? The only time you'd want a good teacher as a sub is if they are going to be in the same class for a week or more. Otherwise, a good wrangler of children is much more important than the ability to teach. And while they may teach child wrangling at University, I haven't seen much proof of it.

Logged

dead0man
Atlas Legend

Posts: 46,566

Re: Should the standards for substitute teachers be higher?

« Reply #1 on: February 07, 2016, 05:34:52 PM »

That sounds like much to good of an idea to catch on.

Logged

Pages: [1]

Jump to:

Page created in 0.022 seconds with 14 queries.