NH Legislator calls for restricting freedoms of libertarians

[dead0man]

Who cares if libertarians take over one tiny state? It would actually be interesting to see how they would run things and what the results would be. I understand that this legislator probably has deep ties to New Hampshire and isn't willing to give it up, but in the grand scheme of things, having libertarians control it would not transform the country.

^^^Give us a few states, give the liberals a few, the Santorums a few, and after 5-10 years we can meet, compare notes, and see what works. Worth a shot.

Of course that would be the best way to do things, but ...ahem.....certain groups don't want that.  You can guess why.

This thread is quite telling about certain posters...

Indeed.

[dead0man]

I'm trying to figure out why this is a story in the first place.....have the Free State people had some success in the last couple of years I hadn't heard about?  They've been trying this for decades now right?

[dead0man]

"Right-to-work" laws clearly violate libertarian principles.

Which ones?  We haven't had a "libertarianism explained by non-libertarians" thread in a couple of months, we are more than due!  And Gully is here, always a bonus on this topic.

[dead0man]

And without right to work laws you are forced to join a union whether you want to or not, does that not violate libertarian principles?