Who scares you more?

[dead0man]

The far left....apparently doesn't exist. 



THE GOOD GUYS WON!  Neener neener!  It (the far left) is a difficult position to hold being as intellectually stupid as it is.  It actually does exist, just few of them are brave enough to admit it out loud because they don't like being laughed at.  You've seen how regular, non "far" left lefties take being laughed at (not well), I can only imagine how hard it would be on a far lefty.

So yes, the far right is more dangerous because the far left is too stupid to organize.  At worst they could maybe get one crazy guy with a bomb (never a gun).

[dead0man]

FAR left, get it right genius

[dead0man]

..and you're still a nice guy.

[dead0man]

I don't consider myself a zionist though...is everybody that supports Israels right to exist a zionist?

[dead0man]

Yeah, that's where I'm at too. 

Would you offer to help if they were attacked and were likely to lose?

[dead0man]

Even it meant the death of all of them that couldn't flee in time?  What if the same situation happened in say, Portugal?

[dead0man]

Well yeah, but we're HUGE parts of both organizations and they ain't going if we aren't willing to go.  Well, we HAVE to go if a fellow NATO state is attacked.

So lets say Israel is on the brink and some of our buddies in Europe decide they don't want to see another holocaust and attempt to assist the Israelis, would you be up for assisting them?  What if they just wanted to use our transportation infrastructure?  Would you be cool with using C5s to ship German Leopards to Tel Aviv?

[dead0man]

Well we all have our idiots (I keep mine in my back pocket) the far right just has more people willing to admit to being far right.

I still don't really understand why it's funny to be libertarian and pro-Isreal, but I suppose that should be left for another thread.  This thread is about making fun of people on the extreme ends of a made up metric and denying the existence of half of them.

[dead0man]

There is a difference between interventionism of the trade and interventionism of the gun.

I'm confused, are you anti free trade?  If so that is much more non-libertarian than being pro-Isreal....at least to me.


(also, your sig is WAY to tall)

[dead0man]

There is a difference between interventionism of the trade and interventionism of the gun.

I'm confused, are you anti free trade?  If so that is much more non-libertarian than being pro-Isreal....at least to me.


(also, your sig is WAY to tall)

He said it's okay to use trade as leverage against nations that committ violations of human rights -a form of interventionism, I believe.

Ahh, I agree with Mechman then.  We shouldn't trade with states that are horrible to their people and that includes the PRC and the Fundies on the Arabian peninsula even it means a drop in the quality of life of Americans and others in the West.

I will admit I'm hesitant for freely signing away on free trade agreements if the nations in question have a poor record on human rights.

Agreed.

[dead0man]

I'd like to point out to dead0man and Mechman, and numerous others, that libertarianism and the Liibertarian Party will never grow if it continues to be defined as real libertarianism and "moralf****try." It is the equivalent of RINO and DINO purging (aka political suicide).

I don't expect the Libertarian Party to ever grow.  I expect (hope?) the Dems or the Pubs will turn more towards libertarianism to win people like me over or a new party springs up after the death of one of the big boys with a strong streak of liberty and small govt.