Democrats refuse bill that would require them to enroll in public health option

[Meeker]

Rep. John Fleming (R-La.) introduced a bill (H. Res. 615) that would require democrat congressmen to enroll in the public-option system they would introduce to the public, and they struck it down.
http://www.cnsnews.com/Public/Content/Article.aspx?rsrcid=50756

Why did these donkey-leftists struck down this bill?

WHAT A BUNCH OF HIPOCRYTES!

I hate to say it, but politicaladdict has a point. Why won't progressive Democrats enroll in the same health care plans they want to introduce to the public?

No he doesn't. This legislation isn't about forcing anyone to do anything. It's about providing options. If you want to choose the public plan because you can't afford a private plan or you don't like your private plan or you don't like paying a for-profit company for health insurance or whatever other reason you may have, you have the option of enrolling in the public plan. Why should members of congress be deprived of that option?

Fleming also didn't introduce a bill, he introduced a non-binding resolution, meaning he had no intention of actually trying to make this a law but rather just wanted to make a stunt.

And it's spelled "hypocrite".

[Meeker]

Rep. John Fleming (R-La.) introduced a bill (H. Res. 615) that would require democrat congressmen to enroll in the public-option system they would introduce to the public, and they struck it down.
http://www.cnsnews.com/Public/Content/Article.aspx?rsrcid=50756

Why did these donkey-leftists struck down this bill?

WHAT A BUNCH OF HIPOCRYTES!

I hate to say it, but politicaladdict has a point. Why won't progressive Democrats enroll in the same health care plans they want to introduce to the public?

No he doesn't. This legislation isn't about forcing anyone to do anything. It's about providing options. If you want to choose the public plan because you can't afford a private plan or you don't like your private plan or you don't like paying a for-profit company for health insurance or whatever other reason you may have, you have the option of enrolling in the public plan. Why should members of congress be deprived of that option?

Fleming also didn't introduce a bill, he introduced a non-binding resolution, meaning he had no intention of actually trying to make this a law but rather just wanted to make a stunt.

And it's spelled "hypocrite".

Well, they have something in the bill that would make insurance companies illegal in about five years, so no choice there.

STUNT?... PLEASE!

No, they don't. Read the bill you idiot.

Fleming's proposal is a stunt. Learn to understand pronouns.

[Meeker]

Let me try to word it a little more correctly for your little libby-brains.

When I say "require into the government-option" is that when it does become a single-payer system.

And even if you get the impression that this Fleming bill would force congressmen into a public-choice regardless, wouldn't matter anyways, RIGHT... because it still great, RIGHT?

The bill, or whatever you libs wanna call it, by Fleming, would not make it into law until after the system turns into a single-payer one.

There WAS a proposal in the bill that eventually made insurance companies illegal and even Barney Frank admitted he wants a public-option because he has FAITH it'll turn into a SINGLE-PAYERone. Look at the youtube link for yourself.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f3BS4C9el98&eurl=http%3A%2F%2Fvideo.newsmax.com%2FManage%2FVideos%2FVideoGallery%2FBarney-Frank--Public-Option-Would-Lead-to-Single-P&feature=player_embedded#t=26

And plus Obama said he wanted a single-Payer system before.

It doesn't hurt to have an amendment ready... just there health plan.

No.

You don't understand what you're talking about.

You haven't read the bill.

You're an idiot.

[Meeker]

Let me try to word it a little more correctly for your little libby-brains.

When I say "require into the government-option" is that when it does become a single-payer system.

And even if you get the impression that this Fleming bill would force congressmen into a public-choice regardless, wouldn't matter anyways, RIGHT... because it still great, RIGHT?

The bill, or whatever you libs wanna call it, by Fleming, would not make it into law until after the system turns into a single-payer one.

There WAS a proposal in the bill that eventually made insurance companies illegal and even Barney Frank admitted he wants a public-option because he has FAITH it'll turn into a SINGLE-PAYERone. Look at the youtube link for yourself.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f3BS4C9el98&eurl=http%3A%2F%2Fvideo.newsmax.com%2FManage%2FVideos%2FVideoGallery%2FBarney-Frank--Public-Option-Would-Lead-to-Single-P&feature=player_embedded#t=26

And plus Obama said he wanted a single-Payer system before.

It doesn't hurt to have an amendment ready... just there health plan.

No.

You don't understand what you're talking about.

You haven't read the bill.

You're an idiot.

Your president hasn't read the bill... YOU IDIOT!

That's the best you can do? Really?

And he's your president too, bub.

[Meeker]

Let me try to word it a little more correctly for your little libby-brains.

When I say "require into the government-option" is that when it does become a single-payer system.

And even if you get the impression that this Fleming bill would force congressmen into a public-choice regardless, wouldn't matter anyways, RIGHT... because it still great, RIGHT?

The bill, or whatever you libs wanna call it, by Fleming, would not make it into law until after the system turns into a single-payer one.

There WAS a proposal in the bill that eventually made insurance companies illegal and even Barney Frank admitted he wants a public-option because he has FAITH it'll turn into a SINGLE-PAYERone. Look at the youtube link for yourself.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f3BS4C9el98&eurl=http%3A%2F%2Fvideo.newsmax.com%2FManage%2FVideos%2FVideoGallery%2FBarney-Frank--Public-Option-Would-Lead-to-Single-P&feature=player_embedded#t=26

And plus Obama said he wanted a single-Payer system before.

It doesn't hurt to have an amendment ready... just there health plan.

No.

You don't understand what you're talking about.

You haven't read the bill.

You're an idiot.

Your president hasn't read the bill... YOU IDIOT!

That's the best you can do? Really?

And he's your president too, bub.

Unfortunately, he is my president. But your more his slave because I assume you voted for him, and I assume you like your master, right?

But, atleast my party reads the bills.

Here's a puppy:



You have a good day