Dan the Roman
liberalrepublican
Sr. Member
![*](https://talkelections.org/FORUM/IMG/star.gif) ![*](https://talkelections.org/FORUM/IMG/star.gif) ![*](https://talkelections.org/FORUM/IMG/star.gif) ![*](https://talkelections.org/FORUM/IMG/star.gif)
Posts: 2,644
![](./avatars/Independent/I_MA.gif)
|
![](https://talkelections.org/FORUM/IMG/post/xx.gif) |
« on: April 11, 2024, 12:07:25 PM » |
|
One of the major shifts is the absence of genuinely Pro-Choice Republicans. There are Pro-IVF Republicans, Republicans who not care and would be happy to settle for 12/15 weeks if the politics were right, and a few who genuinely, deeply care about life of the mother exceptions. As far as I can tell, federally, the latter is the only truly principally committed opposition to the fetal person-hood folks. Many of them are skeptical that 6-weeks is enough to allow effective life/health of the mother care, and absolutely certain anything more restrictive will fail to do so in practice, but there is almost no one making a bodily autonomy argument federally. And that has filtered down to Sununu, Baker, Hogan being anachronisms from another era.
|