GA-6 Special election discussion thread (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 28, 2024, 10:28:19 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  GA-6 Special election discussion thread (search mode)
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4
Author Topic: GA-6 Special election discussion thread  (Read 257307 times)
Brittain33
brittain33
Moderator
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,039


« Reply #50 on: May 11, 2017, 08:53:51 PM »


RIP Handel
Logged
Brittain33
brittain33
Moderator
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,039


« Reply #51 on: May 14, 2017, 05:30:56 PM »

Or maybe we should just be happy that 2 polls have Ossoff up and only one in the past 2 weeks has shown Handel up.

1) They're all within margin of error and don't show anyone cracking 50.
2) Again, victory at what cost and for how long. Seriously, the $/vote ratio for this race is going to be [inks]ing insane. We cannot go toe to to with the GOP in funding. What are we taking from potential strong recruits in KS, PA, the ME-2, the IN-9, and the NE-2 so that Jon Ossoff is in a tossup race on June 20?

I disagree that the funding dynamic is bad for Dems. Ossoff has tapped into new money just for this race. If he wasn't getting this attention, the money would have stayed in people's pockets. It would be better if the wealth were spread around more, but there is always the potential for future Dem races to get Ossoffied and capture millions of dollars.

It's Republicans whose fundraising is static and which won't find new sources of funding they don't already have.
Logged
Brittain33
brittain33
Moderator
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,039


« Reply #52 on: May 14, 2017, 05:43:21 PM »

1) that's a fair point that I hadn't considered. But again, at this point Ossoff would be doing better for the party if he took like, half of this money and put it into a leadership PAC that he helmed if he lost or something equally ludicrous. 

True, the actual sums here have gotten obscene.
Logged
Brittain33
brittain33
Moderator
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,039


« Reply #53 on: May 18, 2017, 08:52:02 AM »

Someone on the ground may be able to answer this but is Handel running a poor campaign?

I don't think this environment enables a Republican to run an effective campaign. Either she stakes out an unpopular position on what her colleagues are doing in Washington or she can't talk about anything. She's doomed either way. This is what I saw with Dems running for Congress over the last several years.
Logged
Brittain33
brittain33
Moderator
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,039


« Reply #54 on: May 19, 2017, 03:17:04 PM »

I don't understand why people think it's going to be really close (<0.5). I mean, based on the results of the first round, Ossoff was the favorite and Trump has become even more unpopular now.

The GOP just has a way of always doing better than expected,
and they have a tight leash on the one demographic that will cut off their arms to vote.


By which you surely mean that the GOP generally runs better campaigns.

I don't think Trump, Thom Tillis, Roy Blunt, Richard Burr, Matt Bevin or Pat Toomey really ran better campaigns than their counterparts...didn't stop 'em from winning. I don't think Handel's running better than Ossoff now.

That seems to be an argument for the overall political environment... and that wouldn't favor Handel in 2017.
Logged
Brittain33
brittain33
Moderator
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,039


« Reply #55 on: May 20, 2017, 08:27:36 AM »

Too many here seem far too confident that Ossoff will win--is there any polling to indicate it won't simply be a repeat (total party %) of the runoff, give or take a point?

The path to repeating the primary results is much harder for Handel than for Ossoff. Ossoff just has to keep his voters, more or less, and Dem enthusiasm seems guaranteed. Handel has to keep her voters and win over all the other R candidates' voters in an atmosphere that, to date, has gotten only worse for Republicans. She can't fight her way out of this conundrum; I think something big external has to happen to shift the election in her favor.
Logged
Brittain33
brittain33
Moderator
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,039


« Reply #56 on: May 22, 2017, 12:09:52 PM »

Pence drew 800 people in Billings in March, which isn't that bad. Not as many as Bernie but it was 2 months ago.
Logged
Brittain33
brittain33
Moderator
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,039


« Reply #57 on: May 22, 2017, 04:29:51 PM »

BRING THE ORB, TRUMP
Logged
Brittain33
brittain33
Moderator
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,039


« Reply #58 on: May 22, 2017, 04:47:02 PM »

If I had the confidence in making predictions from past polls and atmosphere that I last had on November 8, this is where I would expect this race to be...
Logged
Brittain33
brittain33
Moderator
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,039


« Reply #59 on: May 26, 2017, 06:20:19 AM »

It will be very tough for dems to take the house without winning one of these special elections.

I don't see the logic there. With the swings we've already seen in KS-4 and MT-AL, Democrats are projected to take the House with seats to spare in 2018, especially as they line up better candidates than Quist.

It would be a disappointment, and currently unexpected, if we lose GA-6 in June given that unlike Montana that district is relatively sour on Trump. But there's no such thing as a special election 16 months before being a "last chance" to determine a midterm victory!
Logged
Brittain33
brittain33
Moderator
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,039


« Reply #60 on: June 01, 2017, 08:27:22 PM »

By the way, this thread is fast approaching 2,500 posts. Will it be locked at some point, or are we going to try to see this election through on one thread?

I'd lock this thread and open a new one, but what should the new one would be called?
Logged
Brittain33
brittain33
Moderator
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,039


« Reply #61 on: June 01, 2017, 08:32:19 PM »

By the way, this thread is fast approaching 2,500 posts. Will it be locked at some point, or are we going to try to see this election through on one thread?

Personally I'd use this one through the election. I think the issue Dave specified with large threads is that their continued use can cause MySQL to perform slower when it has to fetch data for the thread in question, but since this is a temporary election thread, it will be gone by June 24-25. After that, it will fade into obscurity and the server will no longer be stressed by its biglyness.

Anyways, it's up to ya'll. But fwiw, had already thought about this and left the thread alone because it seemed better to have one collection of Atlas's thoughts on this election as opposed to splitting it up.

I'm happy to defer to you on this, Virginia.
Logged
Brittain33
brittain33
Moderator
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,039


« Reply #62 on: June 03, 2017, 09:43:26 AM »

Strong numbers from DeKalb in the early voting so far: http://politics.blog.ajc.com/2017/06/02/democrat-heavy-dekalb-punches-above-weight-in-early-sixth-district-voting/

Total: 33,957
Cobb: 6,709 (20%)
DeKalb: 9,991 (29%)
Fulton: 16,897 (50%)

The distribution of registered voters in the district is approximately:

Cobb: 29%
DeKalb: 23%
Fulton: 48%

And in the April 18 primary, the vote distribution was:

Cobb: 32%
DeKalb: 23%
Fulton: 46%

As a reminder, Cobb is the most Republican of the three, DeKalb the most Democratic.  Obviously, turnout in DeKalb is strong so far (with the important caveat that it's still very early).  Todd Rehm, a Republican consultant in Georgia, characterized the numbers so far as "alarming".

Early vote (mail and in-person) updated through Friday, June 2:

Cobb: 7997 (19.2%)
DeKalb: 11929 (28.7%)
Fulton: 21642 (52.1%)
Total: 41568

This is the reverse of what we saw in Montana where Trump counties were ahead in % of ballots returned compared to 2016.
Logged
Brittain33
brittain33
Moderator
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,039


« Reply #63 on: June 04, 2017, 08:58:57 PM »

Ossoff has decided to skip a national CNN debate on June 13.

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/democrat-jon-ossoff-to-skip-cnn-debate/article/2624921

What do we think is going on here?
Logged
Brittain33
brittain33
Moderator
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,039


« Reply #64 on: June 06, 2017, 08:34:07 PM »

Not going to lie, it's going to be a big blow if Ossoff loses this election.
Logged
Brittain33
brittain33
Moderator
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,039


« Reply #65 on: June 08, 2017, 12:37:51 PM »

That particular attack line is more about the location of the donations, and not necessarily the amount. For better or for worse, the vast, vast majority of donations to the Ossoff campaign are from out of state, and a number of them are from Nancy Pelosi's congressional district.

To be fair, I believe the vast majority of residents of GA-6 moved to the Atlanta area from somewhere else.
Logged
Brittain33
brittain33
Moderator
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,039


« Reply #66 on: June 08, 2017, 09:45:02 PM »

Between the polling and the turnout so far I don't see how this can't be described as lean D at this point.

Agreed. I'm still gunshy about drawing conclusions from early voting after November, but Ossoff overperformed his polls in round 1 and it's hard to imagine the environment favoring Handel.
Logged
Brittain33
brittain33
Moderator
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,039


« Reply #67 on: June 09, 2017, 07:38:57 AM »

Lean D, confirmed.
Logged
Brittain33
brittain33
Moderator
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,039


« Reply #68 on: June 10, 2017, 10:15:17 AM »

I find it somewhat odd that such a wealthy district like this has such an unfavorable view of the health act.

Polls a few years ago found the strongest opposition to the aca in suburban districts.

Maybe this suburb isn't as fiscally conservative as it first appeared

People don't like government making changes to healthcare, and the response to AHCA is going to be "what bad could the AHCA do," not a mirror image of opposition to ACA.
Logged
Brittain33
brittain33
Moderator
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,039


« Reply #69 on: June 12, 2017, 08:36:20 PM »

Delta Air Lines pilots' union endorses Ossoff today. It represents 14,000 pilots; unclear how many live in GA-6 but surely a few.
Logged
Brittain33
brittain33
Moderator
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,039


« Reply #70 on: June 13, 2017, 08:02:02 AM »

FWIW, Ossoff overperformed the SUSA April poll even if you allocate him half of the undecideds (he had 43% with 7% undecided). All that said, I liked it better when no poll was showing Handel doing this well. Sad
Logged
Brittain33
brittain33
Moderator
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,039


« Reply #71 on: June 13, 2017, 08:34:24 AM »

The DCCC is out with a "we really tried" memo that sure sounds like it's setting a narrative for a loss to Handel. Um.

https://twitter.com/gdebenedetti/status/874616868409155584
Logged
Brittain33
brittain33
Moderator
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,039


« Reply #72 on: June 15, 2017, 09:02:06 AM »

Tom Bonier did a breakdown of EV an Ossoff seems to be getting more black and female irregular voters then first round https://mobile.twitter.com/tbonier/status/875341387763519488

Can anyone explain his table?
Logged
Brittain33
brittain33
Moderator
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,039


« Reply #73 on: June 16, 2017, 10:52:40 AM »


A difference of 2 voters out of 537 respondents.

Early voters report 58% Ossoff - 42% Handel, which is enormous for Ossoff if true.
Logged
Brittain33
brittain33
Moderator
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,039


« Reply #74 on: June 17, 2017, 12:25:02 PM »
« Edited: June 17, 2017, 12:27:43 PM by Brittain33 »

The Obama-Clinton discussion belongs on another thread, guys. I don't want to have to delete posts on it. Thank you.
Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.036 seconds with 11 queries.