Advertising Notes - Where the Dems and Reps are Putting Their Money (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 01, 2024, 12:07:33 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  Advertising Notes - Where the Dems and Reps are Putting Their Money (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Advertising Notes - Where the Dems and Reps are Putting Their Money  (Read 13628 times)
Brittain33
brittain33
Moderator
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,047


« on: September 24, 2010, 09:09:13 AM »

I would think that Critz's success in PA-12 earlier this year would show the limits of this strategy in Appalachia. But we'll see; a mid-term election has a bigger pool of voters than a special election.
Logged
Brittain33
brittain33
Moderator
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,047


« Reply #1 on: September 25, 2010, 09:55:50 AM »

I would think that Critz's success in PA-12 earlier this year would show the limits of this strategy in Appalachia. But we'll see; a mid-term election has a bigger pool of voters than a special election.

It's easier to focus on local issues in a House race than a Senate race.

Well, but, we're not really seeing that distinction in House polling so far. And West Virginia is a small enough state with a homogeneous enough economy, and Manchin has a record of dealing with local issues that Critz didn't, that he should have a leg up in doing so.
Logged
Brittain33
brittain33
Moderator
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,047


« Reply #2 on: September 30, 2010, 08:25:47 AM »

Well, if they can't win now in CA, they can't ever win in CA.

It's the best environment they've had in a while, but there must be a way for a better, less-flawed candidate than Carly Fiorina to become a) the Republican nominee and yet b) afford to campaign in California. Maybe?
Logged
Brittain33
brittain33
Moderator
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,047


« Reply #3 on: October 06, 2010, 08:28:38 AM »


Giffords has a ridiculous amount of money to spend on herself. It would be reasonable for the DCCC to spend money elsewhere where it's better needed.

Either that, or Arizona's going to have 2 Dem congressmen next year.
Logged
Brittain33
brittain33
Moderator
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,047


« Reply #4 on: October 14, 2010, 12:09:43 PM »
« Edited: October 14, 2010, 12:39:56 PM by brittain33 »

Excellent. Kagen was an embarrassment.

Unions just dropped $750k in this one district, and Kagen is a self-funder.

He has a competitive race and may lose, but this is not a sign that he is gone like Driehaus.
Logged
Brittain33
brittain33
Moderator
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,047


« Reply #5 on: October 14, 2010, 02:44:22 PM »

The same article, FWIW, also said that internal polling had Perry leading.

Like Sestak's internal polling?
Logged
Brittain33
brittain33
Moderator
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,047


« Reply #6 on: October 14, 2010, 03:17:48 PM »

"Republicans say that polling shows Perry ahead of Keating, and well-positioned for victory; even many Democratic insiders are pessimistic, and unimpressed with Keating's campaign thus far."

Well, that is depressing. I don't see much redeeming value in Perry. Scott Brown I dislike on many levels, but Perry is tawdry. Diploma mills?
Logged
Brittain33
brittain33
Moderator
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,047


« Reply #7 on: October 19, 2010, 08:33:49 AM »

Cutting advertising for 1/3rd of the district in a supposedly close race isn't a good sign.

Not a good sign, but again, as with AZ-8, the guy is already richer than Croesus which likely entered into the equation.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.033 seconds with 12 queries.