David Frum demolishes Palin's supposed working-class-ness (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 20, 2024, 12:33:00 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  David Frum demolishes Palin's supposed working-class-ness (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: David Frum demolishes Palin's supposed working-class-ness  (Read 1403 times)
Brittain33
brittain33
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,090


« on: January 08, 2010, 01:29:44 PM »

the profession of Palin's uncle has little to nothing to do with how Palin grew up....as to the profession of her mother and father, maybe I don't understand the definition of the working class as the term "working” describes many people of differing income levels…to me it simply means those who must work for their living.

That would loop in the vast majority of the middle class, include east coast professionals and educated elites and the like. This negates the meaning of a term like "working class" as it is commonly understood as distinct from "middle class." Very few people have enough in savings to live off of their investments. A college professor married to a lawyer and currently making $240,000 are not working class because their lifestyles would decline to nothing if they quit their jobs.

Sarah Palin is good at hitting working class cultural buttons without actually having the background. It's one of her great strengths.

I have a good perspective on this because my father is a contactor so he reads as blue collar to everyone in his personality and tastes, BUT he is a trained engineer and successful businessman who makes as much or more than many professionals. So it's not all about wealth. But in Palin's case, she is neither working class in lifestyle OR in the wealth with which she was raised.
Logged
Brittain33
brittain33
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,090


« Reply #1 on: January 08, 2010, 02:06:45 PM »

As a critique of the main topic of the article, all those circumstances don't necessarily mean that the Sarah Palin's family was not "working-class".  At the same time she was growing up, steel workers in Pittsburgh were making $50/hour, with full pension, and benefits... but inspite of that luxurious union salary, which most people don't even know about, steel workers would be considered "working class".

A steel worker had a blue collar job at a white collar wage.
Sarah's parents had white collar jobs at white collar wages.
Logged
Brittain33
brittain33
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,090


« Reply #2 on: January 08, 2010, 03:58:04 PM »

I don't understand the point he's trying to get across. That Jews don't like her because she says she was working class? And so by proving she was actually rich and well to do that will make Jews like her? WTF does that say about Jews?

His point was that the original article was full of sh!t in too many ways to count.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.019 seconds with 12 queries.