Why did Thurmond do so poorly in Georgia in 1948? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 10, 2024, 08:10:46 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  Why did Thurmond do so poorly in Georgia in 1948? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Why did Thurmond do so poorly in Georgia in 1948?  (Read 3568 times)
Kaine for Senate '18
benconstine
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,329
United States


« on: July 25, 2009, 08:18:53 PM »

I believe the Georgia machine was behind Truman.

Yup.  Russell supported Truman that year; had he supported Thurmond, Strom would've won.
Logged
Kaine for Senate '18
benconstine
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,329
United States


« Reply #1 on: July 26, 2009, 11:26:52 AM »

Thurmond won severeal southern states so eaisly because in most of them he was the only on the ballot, as official Democratic nominee

He was only the official nominee, I believe, in South Carolina, Alabama, and Mississippi; Truman was kept off the ballot entirely in Alabama.  In every other Southern state, he had to compete with Truman, which is why he only received 49% of the vote in Louisiana, and under 20% in every other Southern state.
Logged
Kaine for Senate '18
benconstine
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,329
United States


« Reply #2 on: July 26, 2009, 06:22:34 PM »

Atlas only has Thurmond on the Democratic ballot line in MS and AL. In SC, LA he was on the States' Rights line.

Thanks for the correction.
Logged
Kaine for Senate '18
benconstine
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,329
United States


« Reply #3 on: July 28, 2009, 06:17:30 PM »

Incidentally, Dewey performed amazingly well in Alabama.

Not really.  He only got 19%; he got 18% in 1944.
Logged
Kaine for Senate '18
benconstine
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,329
United States


« Reply #4 on: July 28, 2009, 06:31:48 PM »

Incidentally, Dewey performed amazingly well in Alabama.

Not really.  He only got 19%; he got 18% in 1944.

I meant that in comparison to neighboring states. Hoover very nearly won Alabama, for that matter.

He actually did poorly; only in MS did he get under 17% of the vote, and did better in FL and TN, while basically tying in GA.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.024 seconds with 12 queries.