Vermont, 1896 (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 29, 2024, 12:11:16 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  Vermont, 1896 (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Vermont, 1896  (Read 2320 times)
Kaine for Senate '18
benconstine
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,329
United States


« on: October 26, 2008, 12:38:31 PM »

Any reason why McKinley did so well here?  He broke 80%; was it because of Bryan?
Logged
Kaine for Senate '18
benconstine
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,329
United States


« Reply #1 on: October 26, 2008, 01:50:17 PM »

On a somewhat related note, why did Bryan fare so poorly in the Deep South?

He did pretty well, actually; 85% in SC, 67% in AL, and 91% in MS; he only did poorly in GA, where he only hit 57%.
Logged
Kaine for Senate '18
benconstine
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,329
United States


« Reply #2 on: October 26, 2008, 02:07:52 PM »

On a somewhat related note, why did Bryan fare so poorly in the Deep South?

He did pretty well, actually; 85% in SC, 67% in AL, and 91% in MS; he only did poorly in GA, where he only hit 57%.

67% in Alabama was a terrible showing, no?

EDIT: Never mind. Forgot the Appalachian factor.

Actually, it tied 1888 with the strongest performance by a Democrat in the state's history; Georgia was where he did fairly poorly.
Logged
Kaine for Senate '18
benconstine
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,329
United States


« Reply #3 on: December 24, 2008, 07:09:54 PM »

On a somewhat related note, why did Bryan fare so poorly in the Deep South?

Scared the horses, didn't he.

What Huh
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.032 seconds with 12 queries.