Supreme Court's Global Influence Fading (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 20, 2024, 06:59:08 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Discussion
  Constitution and Law (Moderator: Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.)
  Supreme Court's Global Influence Fading (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Supreme Court's Global Influence Fading  (Read 3426 times)
Kaine for Senate '18
benconstine
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,329
United States


« on: September 17, 2008, 05:10:17 PM »

This group of hacks had a pretty big influence on who became the 43rd President of the United States.

First of all, only 7 of the 9 Justices still on the Court voted on Bush v. Gore.  Second of all, except for Thomas, none of the members of the Court in 2000, or in 2008, are hacks.  They are all extremely qualified for their positions.
Logged
Kaine for Senate '18
benconstine
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,329
United States


« Reply #1 on: September 19, 2008, 09:26:17 PM »

This group of hacks had a pretty big influence on who became the 43rd President of the United States.

First of all, only 7 of the 9 Justices still on the Court voted on Bush v. Gore.  Second of all, except for Thomas, none of the members of the Court in 2000, or in 2008, are hacks.  They are all extremely qualified for their positions.



Why, because I'm defending the SCOTUS from wrong attacks?
Logged
Kaine for Senate '18
benconstine
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,329
United States


« Reply #2 on: September 19, 2008, 09:33:01 PM »

This group of hacks had a pretty big influence on who became the 43rd President of the United States.

First of all, only 7 of the 9 Justices still on the Court voted on Bush v. Gore.  Second of all, except for Thomas, none of the members of the Court in 2000, or in 2008, are hacks.  They are all extremely qualified for their positions.



Why, because I'm defending the SCOTUS from wrong attacks?

Anyone defending Bush v. Gore is a total DINO.

I'm not defending Bush v. Gore, I'm defending the Justices themselves.
Logged
Kaine for Senate '18
benconstine
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,329
United States


« Reply #3 on: September 21, 2008, 05:22:40 PM »

This is what happens when the court is full of far right justices.

Hardly.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.02 seconds with 10 queries.