The Most Authoritarian Democratic Candidate (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 02, 2024, 08:36:30 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2020 U.S. Presidential Election (Moderators: Likely Voter, YE)
  The Most Authoritarian Democratic Candidate (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: The Most Authoritarian Democratic Candidate  (Read 3373 times)
Heebie Jeebie
jeb_arlo
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,181
United States


« on: February 19, 2019, 01:22:09 PM »

Which of the Democratic candidates do you think is most authoritarian in disposition?  Which shows the least patience with proceduralism and political niceties?  Which would most aggressively push the envelope of executive authority?
Logged
Heebie Jeebie
jeb_arlo
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,181
United States


« Reply #1 on: February 20, 2019, 01:35:38 PM »

I'm not a Republican but I strongly approve of getting rid of world leaders I don't like. Obviously I don't agree with Republicans on such leaders. Would I support removing Bolsonaro, Modi, Putin and Duterte? Yes, just like I approved of the ouster of Yankovych in Ukraine.

Yeah, that worked out really well for us in Iraq.
Logged
Heebie Jeebie
jeb_arlo
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,181
United States


« Reply #2 on: February 21, 2019, 11:03:39 AM »

I'm not a Republican but I strongly approve of getting rid of world leaders I don't like. Obviously I don't agree with Republicans on such leaders. Would I support removing Bolsonaro, Modi, Putin and Duterte? Yes, just like I approved of the ouster of Yankovych in Ukraine.

I would like to know if others on this site consider this statement as insane as I do.

I do. I think one could argue that the United States has a responsibility to help police international acts of military aggression (as when Bush I intervened to keep Iraq out of Kuwait), but the US should do all it can to stay out of the internal conflicts of other countries (as when Bush II invaded Iraq).
Logged
Heebie Jeebie
jeb_arlo
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,181
United States


« Reply #3 on: February 21, 2019, 11:40:26 AM »

I'm not a Republican but I strongly approve of getting rid of world leaders I don't like. Obviously I don't agree with Republicans on such leaders. Would I support removing Bolsonaro, Modi, Putin and Duterte? Yes, just like I approved of the ouster of Yankovych in Ukraine.

I would like to know if others on this site consider this statement as insane as I do.

I do. I think one could argue that the United States has a responsibility to help police international acts of military aggression (as when Bush I intervened to keep Iraq out of Kuwait), but the US should do all it can to stay out of the internal conflicts of other countries (as when Bush II invaded Iraq).

so saddam is allowed to kill his own people and american enemies (iran), but it's not allowed to attack american oil ally kuwait...

It's ugly, even immoral, but yeah, that's my view. I don't expect everyone to share the same opinion, but if the US assumes the authority to topple any world leader who commits a crime, even a heinous one....well, where does it end? Should we be making plans to attack Russia or China?  Those regimes are certainly guilty of heinous crimes against their own people, but I hope no one is seriously advocating we go to war over it. Better to promote democracy through trade and diplomacy, and use military force only to preserve international order.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.027 seconds with 11 queries.