Orser67
Junior Chimp
![*](https://talkelections.org/FORUM/IMG/star.gif) ![*](https://talkelections.org/FORUM/IMG/star.gif) ![*](https://talkelections.org/FORUM/IMG/star.gif) ![*](https://talkelections.org/FORUM/IMG/star.gif) ![*](https://talkelections.org/FORUM/IMG/star.gif)
Posts: 5,946
![](./avatars/Democratic/D_PA.gif)
|
![](https://talkelections.org/FORUM/IMG/post/xx.gif) |
« on: December 27, 2020, 03:48:25 PM » |
|
Agree with others that AK+CO+NC were clearly winnable. I think you can argue either way with IA depending on how you interpret the state's electoral movement in the last few years (i.e. how elastic it was in 2014), as well as the candidate quality of both Ernst and Braley.
WV+SD were probably unwinnable as open seats, but Rockefeller and Tim Johnson (+Harkin in IA) probably would have at least had a chance if they had run. I'm skeptical that Democrats could have won in MT without Baucus, but a win there at least seems significantly more plausible than in WV+SD.
|