Was Dewey considered some sacraficial lamb in 1944? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 07, 2024, 07:07:53 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  Was Dewey considered some sacraficial lamb in 1944? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Was Dewey considered some sacraficial lamb in 1944?  (Read 1329 times)
Orser67
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,946
United States


« on: June 21, 2020, 01:42:35 PM »

Nah, Republicans thought they had a chance at beating FDR for all three of his re-election bids (though they certainly weren't as confident as they were in 1948), and their belief was partly backed up by polling. For example, Wikipedia has Gallup polls for all three elections, and you can see that a)Gallup's final poll was reasonably close to the actual result for each election, and b)the Republican candidate looked competitive at one point in each campaign.

Part of the reason for their confidence in 1944 specifically was that Willkie had run a relatively competitive campaign in 1940 (the margin isn't fully indicative of how close the race looked for much of the campaign) and a fairly strong Republican year in 1942 (when, for the first time since the early 1930s, Republicans came reasonably close to taking control of one chamber of Congress).
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.024 seconds with 12 queries.