Which is indeed the point. You make the case for it by picking apart each of the items Obama has signed and how it has hurt job creation or with vague generalities that are based in ideologically slanted interpretations. But a quick before and after snapshot to prove factual innaccuaracy isn't suffficient.
The era of objective 100% right or wrong is dead. A new age has begun based on principle and belief. The facts are servants to that priority. This new reality is a fact. You yourself acknowleged it last year during the debt ceiling debate in regards to the media.
There never was an era of objectivity, you're right that we now exist in a place where facts are twisted more than ever before, and that perception, primarily from the media, run politics. But this is not a
good thing, in fact it's something to struggle against as much as possible, and there are still simple up or down facts.
One of those simple facts was all I argued in response to JJ. Whatever you think of this more academic argument we're having, or of Obama personally, the economy is not worse, and he did not make it worse. That itself is a fact and is all that matters in that specific point.
