Preferred foreign policy? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 08, 2024, 08:26:15 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Debate (Moderator: Torie)
  Preferred foreign policy? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: ?
#1
Liberal internationalism with focus on diplomacy, alliances, and international institutions
 
#2
Restrained realism with focus on diplomacy and bilateral, case-by-case relationships
 
#3
Neoconservative primacy with focus on military power and democracy promotion
 
#4
Strict nationalism with focus on military and economic self-suffiency
 
#5
Liberal primacy with focus on both hard and soft power and  humanitarian intervention
 
#6
Libertarian internationalism with focus on free trade and friendly diplomatic relations
 
#7
Some combination of the above (explain)
 
#8
Other (explain.)
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 64

Author Topic: Preferred foreign policy?  (Read 1649 times)
Person Man
Angry_Weasel
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,686
United States


« on: May 31, 2022, 08:01:00 AM »
« edited: May 31, 2022, 08:09:20 AM by Person Man »

Let's look at what works and what doesn't. Neoconservatism sounded great until W totally bungled Iraq and Afghanistan and showed them to be a waste of time. $2 trillion dollars literally set on fire, 6000 dead soldiers, a million dead terrorists and civilians,  and the people in those countries still don't respect us.  Nationalism, like or not, is putting millions of lives and livelihoods in danger. I believe that the inflation started to increase before the pandemic because of Trump's trade wars. The war in Ukraine could have been avoided if we avoided an "America Alone" concept. Libertarian-based neoliberalism has not improved the civic lives of the people in authoritarian regimes and has only caused dictators to gain undue influence over the economies and governments of more liberal countries. Realism, whether or not you agree with the way Kissinger dealt with Vietnam,  could only predict 1 of 4 of the major crises/opportunities of the last 30 years.  

I don't think #2 will work. It sounds like the simplest option up there, but you can't deal with the world at arms length in a time where we don't know what's going to happen with the environment, technology, or even demography. Let alone the fact there are at least a dozen of world leaders who want to be the next Hitler.

I'm going with 5 here. Playing nice doesn't work. Going at it alone doesn't work. Being afraid of bullies because they have more guns doesn't work. Bribing people into being good doesn't work.  It's that simple.

I'd prefer 1 after watching the History Channel for a few years(back when it was the Hitler Channel) after being teased for being too old to watch cartoons when I was 13.

However, after 9/11, Iraq, Syria and the commies and racists that stopped us from helping, Trump, the Pandemic, the general assholery of China and Russia and how big of a let down free trade has been, yeah. I'm going with 5. We have to be tough on predators, whether at home or abroad. Not for our sake, but for everyone's sake.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.027 seconds with 15 queries.