The FBI is out of control (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 05, 2024, 05:35:56 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  The FBI is out of control (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: The FBI is out of control  (Read 2552 times)
Person Man
Angry_Weasel
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,669
United States


« on: November 05, 2016, 09:40:11 AM »

Clinton got 55% of the D vote because voters knew that all of the "scandals" invented against her are bullsh[Inks].

Pretty much that and that any candidate is going to have scandals even if they were Jesus. The Republican Media can make anything into a Watergate or a Nurenburg.  There was already an oppo hit about Bernie buying a $600,000 vacation home. That could have sunk him because what would a socialist be doing with even a modestly extravagant  half million dollar home?

Then again, the Clintons just crank people up. Something about them just makes Republicans lose their fuggin' minds even when they bend over backwards more than any other major Democrat for them (at least amongst those who soon aren't going to change parties).

So two things. There would have been scandals no matter what. But I voted for Bernie in the primaries because beyond the center-left, no one likes the Clintons.
Logged
Person Man
Angry_Weasel
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,669
United States


« Reply #1 on: November 05, 2016, 11:30:05 AM »

Clinton got 55% of the D vote because voters knew that all of the "scandals" invented against her are bullsh[Inks].

Pretty much that and that any candidate is going to have scandals even if they were Jesus. The Republican Media can make anything into a Watergate or a Nurenburg.  There was already an oppo hit about Bernie buying a $600,000 vacation home. That could have sunk him because what would a socialist be doing with even a modestly extravagant  half million dollar home?

Then again, the Clintons just crank people up. Something about them just makes Republicans lose their fuggin' minds even when they bend over backwards more than any other major Democrat for them (at least amongst those who soon aren't going to change parties).

So two things. There would have been scandals no matter what. But I voted for Bernie in the primaries because beyond the center-left, no one likes the Clintons.
I think the Republicans are just scared about Clinton lending a good name to the Democratically party. They need to create the illusion that neither side wants to get anything done, but when you have someone who is openly willing to work across the aisle in the WH, that gets a lot harder.
What does that say about the virtues of working across the aisle?
Logged
Person Man
Angry_Weasel
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,669
United States


« Reply #2 on: November 05, 2016, 01:00:20 PM »

I never thought I'd say this, but the FBI needs to be disbanded and rebuilt from scratch. I hope President Clinton will have the courage to do that (but I highly doubt it).
#DrainTheSwamp
Logged
Person Man
Angry_Weasel
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,669
United States


« Reply #3 on: November 05, 2016, 02:47:14 PM »

Personal responsibility. Thy name is NEVER Democrat.

Blaming the FBI for reopening an investigation when 650,000 e-mails are unearthed is like a fat person blaming McDonalds for their obesity.

Hillary Clinton is the only one responsible for all of this.

It wasn't the FBI's bright idea to host a private e-mail server for official government correspondences.

It wasn't the FBI's bright idea to delete 33,000 e-mails when served with a subpoena.

And it certainly was not the FBI's idea to have your top assistant sync your server on the computer she shared with her perverted pedophile husband.

I'm sorry, Hillary deserves 1000% of the fallout she has wrought here. This was a self-inflicted and wholly unnecessary string of decisions on her part.

The blame that we're here, at a place where America may well elect someone guilty of a felony committed while in high office, doesn't rest squarely on Hillary; it also rests on those donors, who funded her campaign knowing she was under investigations, and on the DNC, which cleared the path for her, running off all Democratic challengers, leaving Bernie Sanders (an Independent) to be the only challenger to Clinton.

Martin O'Malley would be beating Trump.

Once again, you're literally supporting a sexual predator for President.

Is this ironic or what was to follow given Republican policies and coalition politiking?
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.022 seconds with 13 queries.