DeadFlagBlues' professor is probably thinking about YoY changes. The last month's MoM change on Zillow is the same as the MoM change from the height as the housing boom, however that is just for one month. To have a real housing bubble we would have to see it consistently at this level month after month. At the height of the bubble a 1% MoM gain meant 12% annual gains for the national market. So at 3-5% annual gains for 2012, and even with higher 7-9% annual gain projections for 2013, we are significantly short of that.
Hopefully, this can be sustained like the gradual growth that we saw in the 90s and early 2000s. Maybe home prices will be back to where they were in 2020. Some realtor were saying that at the beginning of....this.
Everything I've read about the housing bubble tells me it wasn't having the bubble itself that was the problem, but the fact that it was overinflated by bad bond ratings and a sneaky investment scheme that encourage poor loans. Is that wrong? Was that not regulated out? Is it not possible to have a healthy booming housing market?
Yeah sure, provided the demand is there to create it. The question is, does America really have enough demand to raise housing prices significantly?
Well, if demand and prices are growing despite Dodd-Franks regulations against the mortgage market being in place, then... yes?
The problem is that more and more wealth is concentrated in fewer and fewer hands. It was true before the Great Recession and it's even more true now.
A handful of rich people plus some credit extended to some of the vast number of poor and near-poor people does not make a healthy economy.
Define "poor" and "near-poor"? Are you talking about the 49% of people at or below 200% of the poverty line?