Global Treaty Organization Expansion Bill (Debating) (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 09, 2024, 06:31:06 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Government (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  Global Treaty Organization Expansion Bill (Debating) (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Global Treaty Organization Expansion Bill (Debating)  (Read 5078 times)
HappyWarrior
hannibal
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,058


Political Matrix
E: -3.87, S: -0.35

WWW
« on: August 19, 2009, 05:32:45 PM »

The DOEA supports this measure and would also like to see the inclusion of Ireland if at all possible, Denmark and Greece too.
Logged
HappyWarrior
hannibal
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,058


Political Matrix
E: -3.87, S: -0.35

WWW
« Reply #1 on: August 19, 2009, 06:22:32 PM »

Couldn't we just include the EU? Arguing over including all these smaller European nations is kind of ridiculous. If we have Sweden, we should have Denmark, and if Denmark is in, why isn't the Netherlands, and if the Netherlands is in, why isn't Belgium, and it goes on forever.

Excellent idea Mr. President.
Logged
HappyWarrior
hannibal
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,058


Political Matrix
E: -3.87, S: -0.35

WWW
« Reply #2 on: August 19, 2009, 06:26:40 PM »

The GTO should include countries of major relevance on the world stage, and countries that are close partners of Atlasian.

People can stop nominating their favourite foreign country.

I thought the point of a Global Treaty Organization was to make the strongest alliance possible which would entail having as many allies as possible right?
Logged
HappyWarrior
hannibal
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,058


Political Matrix
E: -3.87, S: -0.35

WWW
« Reply #3 on: August 19, 2009, 06:34:25 PM »

The GTO should include countries of major relevance on the world stage, and countries that are close partners of Atlasian.

People can stop nominating their favourite foreign country.

I thought the point of a Global Treaty Organization was to make the strongest alliance possible which would entail having as many allies as possible right?

There is actually a growing buzz around "minilateralism" in the international relations field, in which agreement of the fewest necessary number of nations is sought to achieve the desired result.

Well call me old fashioned then Wink
Logged
HappyWarrior
hannibal
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,058


Political Matrix
E: -3.87, S: -0.35

WWW
« Reply #4 on: August 20, 2009, 11:43:36 AM »

yeah, the GTO wasn't actually meant to replace the UN.

Seems more like a NATO replacement to me.
Logged
HappyWarrior
hannibal
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,058


Political Matrix
E: -3.87, S: -0.35

WWW
« Reply #5 on: August 22, 2009, 09:32:14 AM »

Instead of nation of the EU make it member nations of the EU, considering it is a economic rather than political and military union.
Logged
HappyWarrior
hannibal
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,058


Political Matrix
E: -3.87, S: -0.35

WWW
« Reply #6 on: August 22, 2009, 09:37:11 AM »

WTF? Israel?  Are you people kidding me?  That's a great way to make more friends and I'm sure 4/5ths of nations will approve

Oddly I agree with DWTL on this, largly on the pointhighlighted...
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.027 seconds with 12 queries.