nuclear energy (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 01, 2024, 02:30:36 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Debate (Moderator: Torie)
  nuclear energy (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: nuclear energy  (Read 5208 times)
NDN
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,495
Uganda


« on: July 30, 2008, 04:13:24 PM »
« edited: July 30, 2008, 04:17:45 PM by It must be your face »
I'm extremely supportive. It's cheap, efficient, and we have ample plutonium reserves. As for the waste, if France found a way to safely of it I'm sure a country as large and resourceful as us can. Besides the Coal Plants we have now cause far more pollution and lung cancer than Nuclear Power has. Actually if you look at the facts the average Coal Plant releases 100 times as much radiation as a Nuclear Power plant of the same wattage.
Logged
NDN
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,495
Uganda


« Reply #1 on: July 30, 2008, 04:20:57 PM »
Read that over again: Comparatively smaller 1st world countries do not appear to be having any serious problems disposing of their waste. If France can use nuclear power for the majority of their electricity, I don't see why we can't use it for at least more than 20% of ours. Especially since, again, our Fossil Fuel emissions kill far more people annually than Nuclear Power ever has.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.016 seconds with 10 queries.