What will the democrats do if they lose in 2008? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 19, 2024, 06:15:20 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Election What-ifs? (Moderator: Dereich)
  What will the democrats do if they lose in 2008? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Well, what will they do?
#1
Go back to the sidelines for as long as it takes until the GOP thinks it can't lose and takes indecent liberties with the public..and they will win in 2012 or 2016 ala 1997 Labor
 
#2
Not change their behavior at all
 
#3
Fire the upper leadership and re-write their platform
 
#4
Operation Rat Phuck : Simply become the "permanent minority" and focus on their state level parties. Basically give up traditional politics and become politcal insurgents
 
#5
Be challenged by another party within their ranks
 
#6
Disband
 
#7
Something Different (explain)
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 24

Author Topic: What will the democrats do if they lose in 2008?  (Read 2031 times)
NDN
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,495
Uganda


« on: July 28, 2008, 03:46:02 PM »

Continue to bash Republican leadership without offering an alternative and cross their fingers in 2012.  The real question is what happens if they lose in 2012 and/or 2016.
They do offer an alternative, the problem is our leaders lack resolve and when they do follow through they get vetoed.
Logged
NDN
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,495
Uganda


« Reply #1 on: July 28, 2008, 04:06:51 PM »
« Edited: July 28, 2008, 04:08:58 PM by Cassidy »

I would like them to move in the direction of Bill Clinton economically, favoring free trade and cutting deficits.

Obviously I would view that as mostly good (though NAFTA needs reform), but the party is essentially already there. Certainly, all of their Presidential candidates have been the last 16 years. And it's not really a vote getter.
Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

I don't see much 'radicalism.' It's only been in the primaries that we've seen Democratic Candidates take a vocally pro-Choice stance. Otherwise the bulk of the party has been emphasizing prevention more. If anything the Democrats are mostly protecting the status quo on social issues as opposed to proposing outright reversing some of the changes of the last 30+ years like the Republicans.

Personally I can't say most social issues matter to me that much other than Civil Liberties though.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
Other than Iraq the vast majority of Democrats are not offering any plans for withdrawal or scaling back the military (unfortunately IMO). In fact, quite the opposite we've seen calls for more military funding consistently as well as a more aggressive position on Afghanistan and Pakistan from the presumptive nominee. So I don't see how they could possibly become more hawkish other than abandoning their stance on that issue. Which coupled with all the other changes you propose would essentially just make them a more moderate wing of the Republican party.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.031 seconds with 15 queries.