why bother caring? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 12, 2024, 12:41:11 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2008 Elections
  why bother caring? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: why bother caring?  (Read 8105 times)
NDN
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,495
Uganda


« on: January 19, 2008, 10:16:10 PM »

I wouldn't jump to that conclusion just yet. Obama actually won more delegates than Clinton, though she had better state turn out. That means the race is still being decided. The real question is who will win CA. But you're right about Hillary vs McCain, that would be depressing. I guess I'd vote for the hackish sellout (McCain) over the two faced control freak (Hillary).
Logged
NDN
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,495
Uganda


« Reply #1 on: January 19, 2008, 10:25:42 PM »

people will be happy so long as their cable tv pumps through and gas is in their car, and the McDonalds drive-thru is open... but hopefully, one day in my lifetime, more Nixon and more Humphrey and more Clinton and more Bush and More McCain will land people with no gasoline and no television and no police and no telephone and chaos...  and then they can do some real thinking...
I've posted similar things here myself, actually. The bottom line is that under Bush we've gotten less free, less solvent and bogged down in places we shouldn't have even entered. But he just sort of accelerated the slow rot that's been developing in this country ever since the 1960's ended. I wouldn't completely lose hope just yet though. People just need some motivation to start caring, and if anything the emerging recession and other problems may do just that.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.017 seconds with 11 queries.