BetoBros: why not Stacey Abrams? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 26, 2024, 03:15:21 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2020 U.S. Presidential Election (Moderators: Likely Voter, YE)
  BetoBros: why not Stacey Abrams? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: ^
#1
Abrams is a woman
 
#2
Abrams is African-American
 
#3
Abrams is unqualified (but Beto isn't)
 
#4
Abrams doesn't support the oil industry enough
 
#5
Abrams lacks 'charisma' (i.e. speaking with white male privilege)
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 35

Author Topic: BetoBros: why not Stacey Abrams?  (Read 953 times)
swords
Rookie
**
Posts: 81
« on: December 27, 2018, 08:02:08 PM »
« edited: December 27, 2018, 08:57:41 PM by swords »

Stacey Abrams ran a more progressive campaign in a red state and came closer to winning. So what rationale is there for hyping Beto and not talking about Abrams running for President, other than cultural biases conscious or unconscious?

Donald Trump vs Stacey Abrams


R 326 D 201
Logged
swords
Rookie
**
Posts: 81
« Reply #1 on: December 27, 2018, 08:58:18 PM »

Stacey Abrams ran a more progressive campaign in a red state and came closer to winning. So what rationale is there for hyping Beto and not talking about Abrams running for President, other than cultural biases conscious or unconscious?

Donald Trump vs Stacey Abrams


R 326 D 201
Lol

she couldn't win GA even in D+9 Year. I don't think she is electable in 2020
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.024 seconds with 17 queries.