So now we have yet another approach defense of Kerry's adventures in southeast asia.
According to this approach we shouldn't look at "...the details of what he did..."
Also, the questions about whether Kerry actually spent christmas in cambodia in 1968 as he alledged is not simply whether he was lying, but wheather he really believes that story.
Although its nice to see NickG tacity admitting that Kerry is less than honest about his adventures in southeast asia, I'm more concerned with whether Kerry is delusional than with his 'dishonesty' or 'courage' (or lack thereof).
I have no idea whether Kerry is being honest or not about each detail of his service...clearly there are conflicting reports, and none of the parties are particularly neutral arbiters.
I'm just saying that just because Kerry has made his courage and sacrifice for his country a theme of his campaign, that doesn't make every detail of his time in Vietnam a relevant campaign issue.
Kerry is trying to establish the basic credentials for a commander in chief. I think he's done that merely by volunteering to serve. I assume he took his boat where he was commanded to take it: on which particular days he happened to recieve enemy fire is purely coincidental.