2018 Congressional Generic Ballot/House Polls Megathread 2 - no debates please (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 03, 2024, 09:12:11 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  2018 Congressional Generic Ballot/House Polls Megathread 2 - no debates please (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: 2018 Congressional Generic Ballot/House Polls Megathread 2 - no debates please  (Read 145064 times)
Fmr. Gov. NickG
NickG
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,256


Political Matrix
E: -8.00, S: -3.49

« on: August 27, 2018, 11:00:51 PM »

These NY-24 and CA-50 polls are pretty disappointing. Obvious the Dems don't need to win these seats for a majority, and if either falls they are looking at a 50-60 seat gain nationally.  But the margins should be closer in a D+7 or D+8 national environment.  I can see the argument for why Katko might fade a bit, but not Hunter.
Logged
Fmr. Gov. NickG
NickG
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,256


Political Matrix
E: -8.00, S: -3.49

« Reply #1 on: August 27, 2018, 11:48:35 PM »

If never thought MO-2 was realistically competitive, so that poll isn't at all surprising to me.

But I did think the electorate in NY-24 would be a but more elastic.  And that Hunter would lose more support this week, even if it didn't immediately go to the challenger.
Logged
Fmr. Gov. NickG
NickG
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,256


Political Matrix
E: -8.00, S: -3.49

« Reply #2 on: August 29, 2018, 08:47:03 PM »

NY-22: Siena, Aug. 20-26, 499 likely voters

Anthony Brindisi (D): 46
Claudia Tenney (R, inc): 44

It is Sienna, so it does have a pro-incumbency bias, but these are still great numbers, and the undecideds in the poll look like they will lean D.

How does a polling firm have a pro-incumbent bias?  Like, what sort of sampling or weighting procedure would produce this?
Logged
Fmr. Gov. NickG
NickG
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,256


Political Matrix
E: -8.00, S: -3.49

« Reply #3 on: August 30, 2018, 11:49:00 AM »

NY-22: Siena, Aug. 20-26, 499 likely voters

Anthony Brindisi (D): 46
Claudia Tenney (R, inc): 44

It is Sienna, so it does have a pro-incumbency bias, but these are still great numbers, and the undecideds in the poll look like they will lean D.

How does a polling firm have a pro-incumbent bias?  Like, what sort of sampling or weighting procedure would produce this?
they tend to give incumbents a better sample. For instance, both this poll and the other NY poll have had a GOP bias of around 3-4 in registration, but when they do D districts, they have a 3-4 D bias.

But why would they do this?  Like, why would you use a different sampling or weighting procedure for races with a Democrat versus Republican incumbent?
Logged
Fmr. Gov. NickG
NickG
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,256


Political Matrix
E: -8.00, S: -3.49

« Reply #4 on: September 06, 2018, 09:46:42 PM »

I feel like these polls are going to need their own megathread.
Logged
Fmr. Gov. NickG
NickG
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,256


Political Matrix
E: -8.00, S: -3.49

« Reply #5 on: September 10, 2018, 11:50:52 PM »

If the numbers in tonight's sample in the NYT poll of TX-23 hold up, there's no way the Dems keep the Senate in 2030.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.026 seconds with 12 queries.