Historically, Montana has had a more union background coupled with a sort of libertarian streak. Also, because of the state’s low population, retail politics were a lot more effective. The Democrats in Montana are more pro-gun statewide, and more conservative on some social issues (though some libertarianism mixed in). This meant the Democrats statewide had a lot of wiggle room, but the national party is not a good fit.
You mean Montana Democrats tend to be more moderate, like Jon Tester and Steve Bullock?
Only if liberal is defined by guns and social issues. I'd say they are center-left of the national party on economic issues.