Why has Montana frequently voted Democratic statewide, but not for president? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 06, 2024, 10:50:50 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Geography & Demographics (Moderators: muon2, 100% pro-life no matter what)
  Why has Montana frequently voted Democratic statewide, but not for president? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Why has Montana frequently voted Democratic statewide, but not for president?  (Read 816 times)
SInNYC
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,227


« on: May 15, 2020, 01:54:19 PM »

Historically, Montana has had a more union background coupled with a sort of libertarian streak. Also, because of the state’s low population, retail politics were a lot more effective. The Democrats in Montana are more pro-gun statewide, and more conservative on some social issues (though some libertarianism mixed in). This meant the Democrats statewide had a lot of wiggle room, but the national party is not a good fit.
You mean Montana Democrats tend to be more moderate, like Jon Tester and Steve Bullock?

Only if liberal is defined by guns and social issues. I'd say they are center-left of the national party on economic issues.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.023 seconds with 10 queries.