How would you rank the Gubernatorial races from most vulnerable to least vulnerable? Here is Chuck Todd's rankings (from National Journal):
1. NEW YORK (Open-R)
2. OHIO (Open-R)
3. IOWA (Open-D)
4. MASSACHUSETTS (Open-R)
5. ARKANSAS (Open-R)
6. COLORADO (Open-R)
7. MARYLAND (Ehrlich-R)
8. WISCONSIN (Doyle-D)
9. MICHIGAN (Granholm-D)
10. ILLINOIS (Blagojevich-D)
11. PENNSYLVANIA (Rendell-D)
12. FLORIDA (Open-R)
13. NEVADA (Open-R)
14. CALIFORNIA (Schwarzenegger-R)
15. ALASKA (Murkowski-R)
16. OREGON (Kulongoski-D)
17. MINNESOTA (Pawlenty-R)
18. ALABAMA (Riley-R)
19. RHODE ISLAND (Carcieri-R)
20. GEORGIA (Perdue-R)
21. MAINE (Baldacci-D)
22. TEXAS (Perry-R)
23. OKLAHOMA (Henry-D)
24. VERMONT (Douglas-R)
25. SOUTH CAROLINA (Sanford-R)
26. CONNECTICUT (Rell-R)
27. TENNESSEE (Bredesen-D)
28. KANSAS (Sebelius-D)
29. ARIZONA (Napolitano-D)
30. NEW HAMPSHIRE (Lynch-D)
31. SOUTH DAKOTA (Rounds-R)
32. IDAHO (Kempthorne-R)
33. HAWAII (Lingle-R)
34. WYOMING (Freudenthal-D)
35. NEW MEXICO (Richardson-D)
36. NEBRASKA (Heineman-R)
http://nationaljournal.com/racerankings/governor/Most of this seems reasonable, but I'd move Calif. up a bit.