Rural areas that swung towards Clinton and/or trended Democrat? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 02, 2024, 02:45:45 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  Rural areas that swung towards Clinton and/or trended Democrat? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Rural areas that swung towards Clinton and/or trended Democrat?  (Read 1192 times)
nclib
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,305
United States


« on: August 26, 2017, 05:37:40 PM »

In the West, a lot of Dem-swinging counties are sizably Hispanic and/or Mormon (though there are still a good number aside from those). Even if McMullin's numbers are added to Trump's, there is still a Dem swing as Romney overperformed with Mormons in 2012.

West Texas, the Texas panhandle, and western Kansas already have sizeable Hispanic populations, already Republican Hispanics, and very Republican whites, so there's not much more room to swing (even if Trump improved upon Romney's numbers nationally with rural Hispanics). It is already easy to draw a couple McCain Hispanic CDs in Texas by avoiding the border and urban areas.

In the states bordering or east of the Mississippi, only the following could arguably be considered rural, that are not on the fringe of a sizeable metro area, and do not have a college town:

East Carroll, LA (though majority black)
Leelanau, MI
Habersham, GA
Lumpkin, GA
Leslie, KY
Perry, KY
Dukes, MA
Nantucket, MA
Chittenden, VT
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.023 seconds with 14 queries.