Why didn't the GOP pick Buchanan in 1996? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 15, 2024, 01:56:44 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  Why didn't the GOP pick Buchanan in 1996? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Why didn't the GOP pick Buchanan in 1996?  (Read 4863 times)
nclib
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,305
United States


« on: January 04, 2016, 10:41:04 PM »

Until this cycle, the GOP rule was that the candidate who came in second previously got the nomination. In 1988 Dole came in second, in 1992 Buchanan came in second. In 1996, there was a bit of confusion about the order, it just took until after NH before the voters decided first in time, first in right.

Wow, I hadn't realized that. Excluding years with a Repub incumbent, this has worked every year since 1980 with the exception of Bush II in 2000. Wonder how much of this is a coincidence.

2012 - Romney - Yes
2008 - McCain - Yes
2000 - Bush II - No
1996 - Dole - Yes
1988 - Bush I - Yes
1980 - Reagan - Yes

As for the topic question, Buchanan is very far right culturally (even though some of his economic stances appeal to working-class Democrats), and the GOP had enough moderates then.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.019 seconds with 10 queries.