I think anyone should be able to refuse service to anyone, for any reason, when it comes to a business they own. The Libertarians have that one right.
So you're saying you support this:
Good to know.
I don't support it, I just don't think it should be criminalized.
See, here is where I diverge from this type of thinking. I think a company has the right to refuse service to anyone, but if they accept customers, they shouldn't than relegate them to a second class status. So segregated drinking fountains are wrong, if you allow the person in the door and accept their business. Does this make sense to everybody? I feel my logic here is a tad bit zig-zaggy.
I agree with this. I didn't pay enough attention to the picture to see that it was a drinking fountain, I glanced at it and thought it was a sign on a door.