To be specific it’s more that squatters rights doesn’t truly exist as written , it’s more a loophole of laws that protect legitimate tenant from eviction which is also bad but less bad.
To what extent should tenant rights exist? Say for example, my landlord and I have a 1-year contract. After six months, he says he wants me to leave, so his brother-in-law can move in.
Should he be allowed to evict me at six months, even though we have a 1-year contract? If he should be allowed to evict me, how much advanced notice should he have to give me?
Firstly your situation details a contract so I would obviously side with the tenant and the landlord would have to at the very least pay the tenant to get them to move out early unless early cancellation was placed into the contract.
But to be more specific, what I mean is that blue states have stricter tenant laws which are bad in my personal opinion but obviously the politicians in blue states want to keep them. However these stricter tenant laws also have the side effect of creating squatter's rights.
