Trans controvesy engulfs the NYT

[lfromnj]

It's getting tough to argue that this isn't the most dangerous issue for people in media to talk honestly about. Israel-Palestine might even be less contentious at this point.

The most dangerous is talking about the prime of a woman

[lfromnj]

The NYT has platformed bad faith anti-trans propaganda, OBJECTIVELY. It doesn't matter whether you agree with the propaganda or whether it disgusts you. Denying that it's bad faith anti-trans propaganda is denying the truth.

Can you post these links to the articles that are anti-trans propaganda and bad faith?

[lfromnj]

The NYT has platformed bad faith anti-trans propaganda, OBJECTIVELY. It doesn't matter whether you agree with the propaganda or whether it disgusts you. Denying that it's bad faith anti-trans propaganda is denying the truth.

Can you post these links to the articles that are anti-trans propaganda and bad faith?

Check Alben's thread from last week.

That thread is seven pages long, why should lfromnj have to dig through 150+ posts to try and figure out which links you're referring to?  Why don't you just post the links to the articles and, ideally, include excerpts of the specific sections that you believe justify labeling them "anti-trans propaganda and bad faith."

I looked through the thread.  One article was the in defense of Jk Rowling which wasn't a reporting article but an editorial.  The main protests against the NYT regards certain journalist who report on practice within the transgender care industry so I am still looking for an article which is anti trans propaganda and bad faith.

[lfromnj]

Again I don't care about Rowling this or that, I can see an argument either way but I don't care. Its more funny as popcorn to me. What I want to know are what are the NYT journal articles that are so transphobic and dangerous that they should be taken down as they cause trans genocide. The staff at the NYT are demanding the newspaper censor articles for this reason and I want to know to what they are.

[lfromnj]

I decided to start watching the video and this is the first thing after the introduction/sponsor stuff. That is the author literally claiming any support of Rowling is violence against Trans people.

Anyway that cares of GMacs argument. Let's get back to the NYT articles that should be censored which is actually what the main focus of this thread should be.