JK Rowling is a TERF

[lfromnj]

while simultaneously rejecting the (obviously wrong) radical idea that anyone can "identify" as whatever they please.

Nope, nobody's rights are being taken away here!

What rights does he want to specifically deny an adult transgender person?
Go ahead.

[lfromnj]

while simultaneously rejecting the (obviously wrong) radical idea that anyone can "identify" as whatever they please.

Nope, nobody's rights are being taken away here!

What rights does he want to specifically deny an adult transgender person?
Go ahead.

The right to use the bathroom that matches their gender identity?

There, that wasn't too hard.

Is he arguing for a bathroom bill or just saying private companies can reasonably set their own rules in a Bathroom and that he might set this policy himself?
I haven't seen where's hes acted unlibertarian here really.

[lfromnj]

while simultaneously rejecting the (obviously wrong) radical idea that anyone can "identify" as whatever they please.

Nope, nobody's rights are being taken away here!

What rights does he want to specifically deny an adult transgender person?
Go ahead.

The right to use the bathroom that matches their gender identity?

There, that wasn't too hard.

Is he arguing for a bathroom bill or just saying private companies can reasonably set their own rules in a Bathroom

If that's the case, then that's more of an issue of libertarian policies having the effect of denying rights to people, even if it isn't actually the government banning people from doing something. But fair enough, that would technically mean I was wrong.

No you are just wrong, you accused him of being a faux Libertarian here, despite the fact he hasn't said anything in this thread contrary to his political beliefs for anyone above the age of 18.(His views on children could be considered ill libertarian or whatever) Criticize his views for what they are, but not hypocrisy.