HB 23-05: Emergency Economic Stimulus Act of 2020 (Passed) (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 24, 2024, 11:32:51 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Government (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  HB 23-05: Emergency Economic Stimulus Act of 2020 (Passed) (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: HB 23-05: Emergency Economic Stimulus Act of 2020 (Passed)  (Read 2797 times)
lfromnj
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,568


« on: March 24, 2020, 08:46:10 AM »
« edited: March 24, 2020, 11:12:10 AM by lfromnj »

Again why is this 3000 per month?
As cruel as this sounds, we don't want a surplus of cash right now as supply right now is quite inelastic because of all the shutdowns, so all this would do would be causing inflation. Later on when the virus is over the law of sticky prices would keep prices generally higher for consumers. Start it with a solid first payment for a month thats and then move onto means testing payments. The first payment shouldn't be means tested as we dont have time to choose but later on we can start doing it as we wan't basically everyone to have the bare minimum to survive this pandemic but we want to avoid giving more than necessary.

I am not gonna be a super deficit hawk during emergencies but we do also need to care about the amount we spend now.

Also is the 25% reduction based on simple or compunded? Im assuming simple as compounded would technically never go away
Logged
lfromnj
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,568


« Reply #1 on: March 25, 2020, 12:48:39 AM »

Again why is this 3000 per month?
As cruel as this sounds, we don't want a surplus of cash right now as supply right now is quite inelastic because of all the shutdowns, so all this would do would be causing inflation. Later on when the virus is over the law of sticky prices would keep prices generally higher for consumers. Start it with a solid first payment for a month thats and then move onto means testing payments. The first payment shouldn't be means tested as we dont have time to choose but later on we can start doing it as we wan't basically everyone to have the bare minimum to survive this pandemic but we want to avoid giving more than necessary.

I am not gonna be a super deficit hawk during emergencies but we do also need to care about the amount we spend now.

Also is the 25% reduction based on simple or compunded? Im assuming simple as compounded would technically never go away

It’s hard to see how this is inflationary when people are being put out of work due to government actions. Please explain.

A one time payment of 3k wouldn't cause too much but plenty of people are still in work, and as future payments continue giving people these 3k when they don't necessarily need it and when nothing is being produced would clearly cause temporary inflation and probably a likely end of some stick prices.
Logged
lfromnj
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,568


« Reply #2 on: March 26, 2020, 08:39:22 AM »

Anyway my opinion of bailout loans is that the first year should be relatively low interest but anything past this year should really be quite high interest to encourage companies to save up.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.027 seconds with 11 queries.