Federal asylum law to change; requiring asylum-seekers to first try elsewhere (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 11, 2024, 02:15:49 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  Federal asylum law to change; requiring asylum-seekers to first try elsewhere (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Federal asylum law to change; requiring asylum-seekers to first try elsewhere  (Read 819 times)
lfromnj
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,651


« on: July 15, 2019, 05:17:28 PM »
« edited: July 15, 2019, 05:35:14 PM by Lfromnj stands with Sanchez. »

100% reasonable idea.

The migrants coming are economic and want to abuse asylum laws. Do I want economic migrants who will likely contribute to the economy? Yes.
 
But these people literally cross half a dozen countries to get to the USA. Even Mexico itself is large enough that large parts of the country are free from violence to a degree.  If Mexico accepts the asylum request then they are simply choosing beggars and not refugees.
Logged
lfromnj
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,651


« Reply #1 on: July 15, 2019, 05:20:19 PM »
« Edited: July 15, 2019, 05:33:46 PM by Lfromnj stands with Sanchez. »

This more or less would mean almost no asylum claims would be valid anymore, right?

I guess it wouldn't affect Venezuelan refugees who generally come through planes.
Logged
lfromnj
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,651


« Reply #2 on: July 15, 2019, 11:02:51 PM »

This will be shot down in court simply because the US does not have a Safe Third Country Agreement with Mexico. The US only has such a law with Canada. Without that agreement with Mexico, US law does not recognize Mexico as a safe third country and, therefore, migrants cannot be rejected for asylum in the US on the basis that they should've applied for asylum in Mexico instead. That's simply not permissible under existing American asylum laws.

Link to source

It should be shot down, but there will be a lot of suffering in the meantime, and I don't have faith in the Supreme Court to uphold the actual law, and it will work its way there.

How is there any suffering? All we are saying is just don't claim asylum as you pass through other safe zones just to get into a 1st world country.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.024 seconds with 10 queries.