SCOTUS 2022-2023 Term (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 02, 2024, 08:19:50 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Discussion
  Constitution and Law (Moderator: Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.)
  SCOTUS 2022-2023 Term (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: SCOTUS 2022-2023 Term  (Read 7656 times)
soundchaser
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,630


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -6.26

P P P
« on: June 23, 2023, 01:17:08 PM »

This seems like it might be worth mentioning though:


Barrett and Kavanaugh *both* seemingly narrowing the reasons states can sue makes me hopeful. I don't know how Alito gets a majority without either of them.
Logged
soundchaser
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,630


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -6.26

P P P
« Reply #1 on: June 26, 2023, 10:17:30 AM »

Kavanaugh is not inconsistent in his judicial philosophy, even if I disagree with it most of the time. From what we've seen of Barrett's writing, neither is she. If they were as brazenly corrupt as you suggest, US v. Texas would not have been decided the way it was.
Logged
soundchaser
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,630


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -6.26

P P P
« Reply #2 on: June 27, 2023, 09:09:09 AM »

Gorsuch has a second opinion from November. That upends my calculus.
Do you think we're looking at a lost majority for Roberts or Alito?
Logged
soundchaser
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,630


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -6.26

P P P
« Reply #3 on: June 29, 2023, 09:02:24 AM »

Alito has both Abitron and Groff. Could Sotomayor have Nebraska???
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.023 seconds with 10 queries.